Zhou Wenyuan, Li Yajie, Xu Xuechao, Rao Shengqi, Wen Hua, Han Yeiling, Deng Aiping, Zhang Zhenwen, Yang Zhenquan, Zhu Guoqiang
College of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Front Microbiol. 2023 Mar 10;14:1088125. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1088125. eCollection 2023.
Prophages as a part of genome contribute to the genetic diversity as well as survival strategies of their host. Some prophages also have an imminent risk of host cell lysis and become a lytic phage. Nonetheless, interactions among prophages, lytic phages, and their hosts, as well as the genetic diversity of prophages, remain unclear. We identified 579 intact and 1,389 incomplete prophages in the genomes of 493 isolates obtained from the NCBI database. The structural diversity and gene content of intact and incomplete prophages were investigated and compared with 188 lytic phages. Mosaic structure comparison, ortholog group clustering, phylogenetic analysis, and recombination network analysis were performed to estimate genetic relatedness among intact prophages, incomplete prophages, and lytic phages. The intact and incomplete prophages harbored 148 and 522 distinct mosaic structures, respectively. The major difference between lytic phages and prophages was the lack of functional modules and genes. Compared to the lytic phages, both the intact and incomplete prophages harbored multiple antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and virulence factor (VF) genes. Several functional modules of lytic phages 3_AJ_2017 and 23MRA shared more than 99% nucleotide sequence identity with intact (ST20130943_p1 and UTSW_ MRSA_55_ip3) and incomplete prophages (SA3_LAU_ip3 and MRSA_FKTN_ip4); other modules showed little nucleotide sequence similarity. Ortholog and phylogenetic analyses revealed a common gene pool shared between the prophages and lytic Siphoviridae phages. Moreover, most shared sequences existed within intact (43428/137294, 31.6%) and incomplete prophages (41248/137294, 30.0%). Therefore, the maintenance or loss of functional modules in intact and incomplete prophages is key to balance the costs and benefits of large prophages harboring various AMR and VF genes in the bacterial host. The shared identical functional modules between lytic phages and prophages are likely to result in the exchange, acquisition, and loss of functional modules, and therefore contribute to their genetic diversity. Moreover, constant recombination events within prophages globally were responsible for the coevolution of lytic phages and their bacterial hosts.
原噬菌体作为基因组的一部分,对其宿主的遗传多样性和生存策略有贡献。一些原噬菌体也存在宿主细胞裂解的紧迫风险,并转变为裂解性噬菌体。尽管如此,原噬菌体、裂解性噬菌体及其宿主之间的相互作用,以及原噬菌体的遗传多样性仍不清楚。我们从NCBI数据库获得的493个分离株的基因组中鉴定出579个完整和1389个不完整的原噬菌体。对完整和不完整原噬菌体的结构多样性和基因内容进行了研究,并与188个裂解性噬菌体进行了比较。进行了镶嵌结构比较、直系同源群组聚类、系统发育分析和重组网络分析,以估计完整原噬菌体、不完整原噬菌体和裂解性噬菌体之间的遗传相关性。完整和不完整原噬菌体分别具有148种和522种不同的镶嵌结构。裂解性噬菌体和原噬菌体之间的主要区别在于缺乏功能模块和基因。与裂解性噬菌体相比,完整和不完整原噬菌体都含有多个抗菌抗性(AMR)和毒力因子(VF)基因。裂解性噬菌体3_AJ_2017和23MRA的几个功能模块与完整(ST20130943_p1和UTSW_MRSA_55_ip3)和不完整原噬菌体(SA3_LAU_ip3和MRSA_FKTN_ip4)的核苷酸序列同一性超过99%;其他模块显示出很少的核苷酸序列相似性。直系同源和系统发育分析揭示了原噬菌体和裂解性长尾噬菌体科噬菌体之间共享一个共同的基因库。此外,大多数共享序列存在于完整(43428/137294,31.6%)和不完整原噬菌体(41248/137294,30.0%)中。因此,完整和不完整原噬菌体中功能模块的维持或丧失是平衡细菌宿主中携带各种AMR和VF基因的大型原噬菌体的成本和收益的关键。裂解性噬菌体和原噬菌体之间共享相同的功能模块可能导致功能模块的交换、获得和丧失,因此有助于它们的遗传多样性。此外,全球范围内原噬菌体内部持续的重组事件导致了裂解性噬菌体及其细菌宿主的共同进化。