• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TANGO:制定消费者信息传单以支持低腰背痛和髋膝关节骨关节炎老年患者阿片类药物的 TAPERI NG。

TANGO: Development of Consumer Information Leaflets to Support TAperiNG of Opioids in Older Adults with Low Back Pain and Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.

机构信息

The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health and Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Level 10, Kolling Building, Gamaragal Country, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia.

The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Eora Country, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2023 Apr;40(4):343-354. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01011-x. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1007/s40266-023-01011-x
PMID:36972011
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10040925/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Globally, the rate of opioid prescription is high for chronic musculoskeletal conditions despite guidelines recommending against their use as their adverse effects outweigh their modest benefit. Deprescribing opioids is a complex process that can be hindered by multiple prescriber- and patient-related barriers. These include fear of the process of, or outcomes from, weaning medications, or a lack of ongoing support. Thus, involving patients, their carers, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the development of consumer materials that can educate and provide support for patients and HCPs over the deprescribing process is critical to ensure that the resources have high readability, usability, and acceptability to the population of interest.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to (1) develop two educational consumer leaflets to support opioid tapering in older people with low back pain (LBP) and hip or knee osteoarthritis (HoKOA), and (2) evaluate the perceived usability, acceptability, and credibility of the consumer leaflets from the perspective of consumers and HCPs.

DESIGN

This was an observational survey involving a consumer review panel and an HCP review panel.

PARTICIPANTS

30 consumers (and/or their carers) and 20 HCPs were included in the study. Consumers were people older than 65 years of age who were currently experiencing LBP or HoKOA, and with no HCP background. Carers were people who provided unpaid care, support, or assistance to an individual meeting the inclusion criteria for consumers. HCPs included physiotherapists (n = 9), pharmacists (n = 7), an orthopaedic surgeon (n = 1), a rheumatologist (n = 1), nurse practitioner (n = 1) and a general practitioner (n = 1), all with at least three years of clinical experience and who reported working closely with this target patient population within the last 12 months.

METHODS

Prototypes of two educational consumer leaflets (a brochure and a personal plan) were developed by a team of LBP, OA, and geriatric pharmacotherapy researchers and clinicians. The leaflet prototypes were evaluated by two separate chronological review panels involving (1) consumers and/or their carers, and (2) HCPs. Data collection for both panels occurred via an online survey. Outcomes were the perceived usability, acceptability, and credibility of the consumer leaflets. Feedback received from the consumer panel was used to refine the leaflets, before circulating the leaflets for further review by the HCP panel. Additional feedback from the HCP review panel was then used to refine the final versions of the consumer leaflets.

RESULTS

Both consumers and HCPs perceived the leaflets and personal plan to be usable, acceptable, and credible. Consumers rated the brochure against several categories, which scored between 53 and 97% positive responses. Similarly, the overall feedback provided by HCPs was 85-100% positive. The modified System Usability Scale scores obtained from HCPs was 55-95% positive, indicating excellent usability. Feedback for the personal plan from both HCPs and consumers was largely positive, with consumers providing the highest positive ratings (80-93%). While feedback for HCPs was also high, we did identify that prescribers were hesitant to provide the plan to patients frequently (no positive responses).

CONCLUSIONS

This study led to the development of a leaflet and personal plan to support the reduction of opioid use in older people with LBP or HoKOA. The development of the consumer leaflets incorporated feedback provided by HCPs and consumers to maximise clinical effectiveness and future intervention implementation.

摘要

简介

全球范围内,尽管指南建议避免使用阿片类药物,因其不良反应超过了其适度的益处,但慢性肌肉骨骼疾病的阿片类药物处方率仍然很高。减少阿片类药物的使用是一个复杂的过程,可能会受到多种与处方者和患者相关的障碍的阻碍。这些障碍包括对药物减药过程或结果的恐惧,或缺乏持续的支持。因此,让患者、他们的照顾者和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)参与制定消费者材料,以教育和支持患者和 HCPs 度过减药过程,对于确保资源具有高可读性、可用性和可接受性至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在(1)制定两份支持老年人腰痛(LBP)和髋或膝关节骨关节炎(HoKOA)患者阿片类药物逐渐减少的教育性消费者传单,以及(2)从消费者和 HCP 的角度评估消费者传单的感知可用性、可接受性和可信度。

设计

这是一项观察性调查,涉及消费者审查小组和 HCP 审查小组。

参与者

共有 30 名消费者(和/或他们的照顾者)和 20 名 HCP 参与了这项研究。消费者是年龄在 65 岁以上,目前正在经历 LBP 或 HoKOA,并且没有 HCP 背景的人。照顾者是为符合消费者纳入标准的个人提供无薪护理、支持或帮助的人。HCPs 包括物理治疗师(n=9)、药剂师(n=7)、骨科医生(n=1)、风湿病专家(n=1)、护士从业者(n=1)和全科医生(n=1),他们都有至少三年的临床经验,并报告在过去 12 个月内与这一目标患者群体密切合作。

方法

由 LBP、OA 和老年药物治疗学研究人员和临床医生组成的团队制定了两份教育性消费者传单(一本小册子和一份个人计划)的原型。传单原型由两个独立的按时间顺序排列的审查小组进行评估,其中包括(1)消费者和/或他们的照顾者,以及(2)HCPs。两个小组都通过在线调查收集数据。结果是消费者传单的感知可用性、可接受性和可信度。从消费者小组收到的反馈用于改进传单,然后在 HCP 小组进一步审查之前分发传单。然后,HCP 审查小组的额外反馈用于改进消费者传单的最终版本。

结果

消费者和 HCP 都认为传单和个人计划是可用的、可接受的和可信的。消费者对小册子进行了多项评估,评分在 53%到 97%之间为正面回应。同样,HCP 提供的整体反馈也是 85-100%为正面。HCP 获得的改良系统可用性量表评分在 55-95%之间为正面,表明可用性极好。来自 HCPs 和消费者的个人计划的反馈大多为正面,消费者的评分最高(80-93%)。虽然 HCP 的反馈也很高,但我们确实发现,医生不愿意经常向患者提供该计划(没有正面回应)。

结论

本研究开发了一份支持 LBP 或 HoKOA 老年患者减少阿片类药物使用的传单和个人计划。消费者传单的开发纳入了 HCPs 和消费者提供的反馈,以最大限度地提高临床效果和未来干预措施的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6421/10113318/43e5f8be5d83/40266_2023_1011_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6421/10113318/43e5f8be5d83/40266_2023_1011_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6421/10113318/43e5f8be5d83/40266_2023_1011_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
TANGO: Development of Consumer Information Leaflets to Support TAperiNG of Opioids in Older Adults with Low Back Pain and Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.TANGO:制定消费者信息传单以支持低腰背痛和髋膝关节骨关节炎老年患者阿片类药物的 TAPERI NG。
Drugs Aging. 2023 Apr;40(4):343-354. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01011-x. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Development of consumer information leaflets for deprescribing in older hospital inpatients: a mixed-methods study.为老年住院患者减药开发患者信息传单:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e033303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033303.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
A Digital Video and Text Messaging Intervention to Support People With Chronic Pain During Opioid Tapering: Content Development Using Co-design.一种支持阿片类药物减量期间慢性疼痛患者的数字视频和短信干预:采用协同设计的内容开发
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 10;6(11):e40507. doi: 10.2196/40507.
6
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
7
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
8
Barriers and enablers to monitoring and deprescribing opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain: a systematic review with qualitative evidence synthesis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.监测和减少慢性非癌症疼痛阿片类镇痛药的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架进行系统评价和定性证据综合。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 May;31(5):387-400. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014186. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
9
Performance and image enhancing drug interventions aimed at increasing knowledge among healthcare professionals (HCP): reflections on the implementation of the Dopinglinkki e-module in Europe and Australia in the HCP workforce.旨在提高医疗保健专业人员(HCP)知识水平的表现和增强图像药物干预:对在 HCP 劳动力中实施 Dopinglinkki e 模块在欧洲和澳大利亚的实施情况的反思。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Sep;95:103141. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103141. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
10
Low back pain beliefs are associated to age, location of work, education and pain-related disability in Chinese healthcare professionals working in China: a cross sectional survey.在中国工作的中国医护人员中,腰痛观念与年龄、工作地点、教育程度及疼痛相关残疾有关:一项横断面调查。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jul 28;15:255. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-255.

引用本文的文献

1
An evidence-based digital prescription opioid safety toolkit for national dissemination: co-design and user testing.用于全国推广的基于证据的数字处方阿片类药物安全工具包:联合设计与用户测试
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jul 11;7:1600836. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1600836. eCollection 2025.
2
Accessible Patient Education Materials for Low Back Pain Rarely Meet People's Information Needs: A Scoping Review.针对腰痛的可获取患者教育材料很少能满足人们的信息需求:一项范围综述。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Jun;23(2):e70130. doi: 10.1002/msc.70130.
3
Older Adult and Primary Care Practitioner Perspectives on Using, Prescribing, and Deprescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.

本文引用的文献

1
Opioids and Falls Risk in Older Adults: A Narrative Review.阿片类药物与老年人跌倒风险:一项叙述性综述。
Drugs Aging. 2022 Mar;39(3):199-207. doi: 10.1007/s40266-022-00929-y. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
2
Barriers and enablers to monitoring and deprescribing opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain: a systematic review with qualitative evidence synthesis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.监测和减少慢性非癌症疼痛阿片类镇痛药的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架进行系统评价和定性证据综合。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 May;31(5):387-400. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014186. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
3
"The lesser of two evils": a framework analysis of consumers' perspectives on opioid deprescribing and the development of opioid deprescribing guidelines.
老年人和初级保健医生对使用、开处和停用阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e241342. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1342.
“两害相权取其轻”:对消费者对阿片类药物减用观点和阿片类药物减用指南制定的框架分析。
Pain. 2021 Nov 1;162(11):2686-2692. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002270.
4
What proportion of patients with chronic noncancer pain are prescribed an opioid medicine? Systematic review and meta-regression of observational studies.有多少慢性非癌痛患者被开具了阿片类药物处方?观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
J Intern Med. 2020 May;287(5):458-474. doi: 10.1111/joim.13026. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
Development of consumer information leaflets for deprescribing in older hospital inpatients: a mixed-methods study.为老年住院患者减药开发患者信息传单:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e033303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033303.
6
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.支持患者和公众参与研究的框架:系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
7
General practitioners and management of chronic noncancer pain: a cross-sectional survey of influences on opioid deprescribing.全科医生与慢性非癌性疼痛的管理:关于阿片类药物减药影响因素的横断面调查
J Pain Res. 2019 Jan 22;12:467-475. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S168785. eCollection 2019.
8
Strategies to promote public engagement around deprescribing.促进围绕减药开展公众参与的策略。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018 Sep 12;9(11):653-665. doi: 10.1177/2042098618794165. eCollection 2018 Nov.
9
Identification of behaviour change techniques in deprescribing interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.识别减药干预措施中的行为改变技术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;84(12):2716-2728. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13742. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
10
The extent, quality and impact of patient and public involvement in primary care research: a mixed methods study.患者及公众参与基层医疗研究的程度、质量及影响:一项混合方法研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 May 24;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0100-8. eCollection 2018.