Department of Global Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Technical Resources International, 6500 Rock Spring Dr #650, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2023 May 17;38(5):579-592. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad020.
Performance management (PM) reforms have been introduced in health systems worldwide to improve accountability, transparency and learning. However, gaps in evidence exist regarding the ways in which PM contributes to organizational-level outcomes. Between 2015 and 2017, the government of El Salvador and the Salud Mesoamerica Initiative (SMI) introduced team-based PM interventions in the country's primary health care (PHC) system including target setting, performance measurement, provision of feedback and in-kind incentives. The programme's evaluation showed widespread improvements in performance for community outreach and service timeliness, quality and utilization. The current study characterizes how the implementation of team-based PM interventions by SMI implementers contributed to PHC system performance improvements. We used a descriptive, single-case study design informed by a programme theory (PT). Data sources included qualitative in-depth interviews and SMI programme documents. We interviewed the members of four PHC teams (n = 13), Ministry of Health (MOH) decision makers (n = 8) and SMI officials (n = 6). Coded data were summarized, and thematic analysis was employed to identify broader categories and patterns. The outcomes chain in the PT was refined based on empirical findings that revealed the convergence of two processes: (1) increased social interactions and relationships among implementers that enhanced communication and created opportunities for social learning and (2) cyclical performance monitoring that generated novel flows of information. These processes contributed to emergent outcomes including the uptake of performance information, altruistic behaviours in service delivery and organizational learning. Through time, the cyclical nature of PM appears to have led to the spread of these behaviours beyond the teams studied here, thus contributing to system-wide effects. Findings illustrate the social nature of implementation processes and describe plausible pathways through which lower-order implementation programme effects can contribute to higher-order changes in system performance.
绩效管理 (PM) 改革已在全球卫生系统中推行,以提高问责制、透明度和学习能力。然而,关于 PM 如何促进组织层面结果的证据存在差距。2015 年至 2017 年间,萨尔瓦多政府和中美洲健康倡议 (SMI) 在该国的初级卫生保健 (PHC) 系统中引入了基于团队的 PM 干预措施,包括目标设定、绩效衡量、提供反馈和实物奖励。该计划的评估显示,社区外展和服务及时性、质量和利用率方面的绩效普遍提高。目前的研究描述了 SMI 实施者实施基于团队的 PM 干预措施如何促进 PHC 系统绩效的提高。我们使用描述性的、受方案理论 (PT) 指导的单一案例研究设计。数据来源包括定性深入访谈和 SMI 方案文件。我们采访了四个 PHC 团队的成员 (n=13)、卫生部 (MOH) 决策者 (n=8) 和 SMI 官员 (n=6)。对编码数据进行了总结,并采用主题分析来确定更广泛的类别和模式。PT 中的结果链根据经验发现进行了改进,这些发现揭示了两个过程的趋同:(1) 实施者之间的社会互动和关系增加,促进了沟通,并为社会学习创造了机会;(2) 周期性的绩效监测产生了新的信息流。这些过程促成了新的结果,包括对绩效信息的采用、服务提供中的利他行为和组织学习。随着时间的推移,PM 的周期性似乎导致这些行为在研究之外的团队中传播,从而对系统范围产生影响。研究结果说明了实施过程的社会性,并描述了较低层次的实施方案效果如何促成系统绩效的更高层次变化的可能途径。