Kelly-Hedrick Margot, Iuliano Kayla, Tackett Sean, Chisolm Margaret S
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2023 Mar 3;12:28. doi: 10.12688/mep.19094.2. eCollection 2022.
Medical education research often focuses on measuring negative mental states like burnout, rather than focusing on positive states like well-being. Flourishing - a state that includes domains of happiness and mental health - is a way of thinking about well-being that may be relevant to education and research. The purpose of this prospective, observational study was to compare the relationship among flourishing, other well-being measures, and burnout in medical students via a survey administered at two time points. We surveyed medical students at one U.S. institution about their flourishing, satisfaction with work-life balance, quality of life, empathic concern, and burnout (emotional exhaustion and depersonalization) before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Flourishing was measured using two scores, the Flourish Index (FI) and Secure Flourish Index (SFI), with higher scores indicating greater flourishing. Pre- and post-scores for both measures were compared. 107/585 (18%) medical students responded to the survey and 78/107 (73%) participated in the post survey. At the first time point, respondents reported both a mean FI and SFI 6.7 (SD=1.3); higher levels of flourishing correlated with higher satisfaction with work-life balance (p<.001), higher quality of life (p<.001), and lower levels of burnout (emotional exhaustion p<.001; depersonalization p=.021). SFI scores were higher at the second time point (M=7.1, SD=1.2) than the first (M=6.7, SD=1.3, p=.026). FI, satisfaction with work-life balance, quality of life, empathic concern, and burnout were unchanged at the second time point. Like past findings in medical residents, we found medical students' flourishing-as measured by FI and SFI scores-correlated with greater satisfaction with work-life balance, higher quality of life, and lower burnout. In this limited sample, we found flourishing remained largely unchanged after the COVID-19 pandemic onset.
医学教育研究通常侧重于衡量诸如职业倦怠等消极心理状态,而非关注诸如幸福感等积极状态。蓬勃发展——一种包含幸福和心理健康领域的状态——是一种思考幸福感的方式,可能与教育和研究相关。这项前瞻性观察研究的目的是通过在两个时间点进行的一项调查,比较医学生的蓬勃发展、其他幸福感指标与职业倦怠之间的关系。
我们对美国一所机构的医学生在新冠疫情爆发前后的蓬勃发展、工作生活平衡满意度、生活质量、共情关注和职业倦怠(情感耗竭和去个性化)情况进行了调查。蓬勃发展通过两个分数来衡量,即蓬勃发展指数(FI)和安全蓬勃发展指数(SFI),分数越高表明蓬勃发展程度越高。对这两个指标的前后得分进行了比较。107/585(18%)的医学生回复了调查,78/107(73%)的学生参与了后续调查。在第一个时间点,受访者报告的FI和SFI平均得分均为6.7(标准差=1.3);更高水平的蓬勃发展与更高的工作生活平衡满意度(p<0.001)、更高的生活质量(p<0.001)以及更低水平的职业倦怠(情感耗竭p<0.001;去个性化p=0.021)相关。SFI得分在第二个时间点(M=7.1,标准差=1.2)高于第一个时间点(M=6.7,标准差=1.3,p=0.026)。FI、工作生活平衡满意度、生活质量、共情关注和职业倦怠在第二个时间点没有变化。
与过去对住院医师的研究结果一样,我们发现,用FI和SFI分数衡量的医学生的蓬勃发展与更高的工作生活平衡满意度、更高的生活质量和更低的职业倦怠相关。在这个有限的样本中,我们发现新冠疫情爆发后,蓬勃发展情况基本保持不变。