• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜工作通道缺陷的微型柔性镜诊断的临床评估。

Clinical Evaluation of Miniature Flexible Scope for Diagnosis of Ureteroscope Working Channel Defects.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2023 Jun;37(6):628-633. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0642. Epub 2023 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1089/end.2022.0642
PMID:36974366
Abstract

To evaluate flexible ureteroscope working channels with a 1.06 mm digital borescope (Clarus Medical, Minneapolis, MN) and identify factors contributing to ureteroscope damage over time. We performed a single institutional prospective study of patients undergoing stone surgery using a nondisposable flexible ureteroscope. A 1.06 mm borescope was used to evaluate ureteroscopes before and after surgery. Borescope videos were reviewed by two independent researchers to quantify average pre- and postprocedural damage. Twenty-five procedures were performed with pre- and postprocedural borescope assessment between August 2021 and February 2022. All patients received preoperative CT imaging depicting a mean axial stone size of 14.1 ± 8.4 mm and density of 923.4 ± 458.1 HU. Mean operative time was 63.8 ± 34.0 minutes. The average number an instrument passes through the working channel was 2.1 ± 1.6. Laser was used in 11 cases with mean laser time of 18.8 ± 19.7 minutes and mean total energy of 5.8 ± 4.2 KJ. On preoperative assessment, all ureteroscopes had some form of defect (24% shave, 32% pinhole, 96% dents and scratches, and 28% discolorations). During postoperative assessment, 23/25 (92%) ureteroscopes showed additional damage with an average of 3.7 ± 2.8 imperfections acquired after one use. Significant differences were seen in acquired shavings ( = 0.028) and scratches or dents ( = 0.018). Of the 355 imperfections seen on postoperative evaluation, 0.4% were shave, 3% were pinhole, 85.8% were dents and scratches, and 10.8% were discolorations. The Clarus borescope observed defects after the majority of flexible ureteroscopy procedures for nephrolithiasis. Although such disruptions may not immediately render ureteroscopes nonfunctional, they are more common than previously described and could increase maintenance costs. Further studies are needed to investigate the burden of unit damage per procedure to raise operator awareness and reduce preventable ureteroscope imperfections.

摘要

评估使用 1.06mm 数字硬管镜(明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市 Clarus Medical)的输尿管镜工作通道,并确定随时间推移导致输尿管镜损坏的因素。

我们对使用非一次性软性输尿管镜进行结石手术的患者进行了单机构前瞻性研究。使用 1.06mm 硬管镜在手术前后评估输尿管镜。两名独立研究人员审查硬管镜视频,以量化平均术前和术后损伤。

2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 2 月期间进行了 25 例手术,术前和术后均进行了硬管镜评估。所有患者均接受术前 CT 成像,显示平均轴向结石大小为 14.1±8.4mm,密度为 923.4±458.1HU。平均手术时间为 63.8±34.0 分钟。仪器通过工作通道的平均次数为 2.1±1.6 次。11 例使用激光,平均激光时间为 18.8±19.7 分钟,平均总能量为 5.8±4.2KJ。术前评估时,所有输尿管镜均存在某种形式的缺陷(24%的刮痕、32%的针孔、96%的凹痕和划痕,以及 28%的变色)。术后评估时,25 个输尿管镜中有 23 个(92%)显示出额外的损伤,每个输尿管镜在使用一次后平均增加了 3.7±2.8 个缺陷。在获得的刮痕( = 0.028)和划痕或凹痕( = 0.018)方面存在显著差异。术后评估共观察到 355 个缺陷,其中 0.4%为刮痕,3%为针孔,85.8%为凹痕和划痕,10.8%为变色。Clarus 硬管镜观察到大多数用于肾结石的软性输尿管镜手术后出现的缺陷。尽管这些损坏可能不会立即使输尿管镜失去功能,但它们比以前描述的更为常见,并且可能会增加维护成本。需要进一步研究以调查每次手术单位损坏的负担,以提高操作人员的意识并减少可预防的输尿管镜缺陷。

相似文献

1
Clinical Evaluation of Miniature Flexible Scope for Diagnosis of Ureteroscope Working Channel Defects.经皮肾镜工作通道缺陷的微型柔性镜诊断的临床评估。
J Endourol. 2023 Jun;37(6):628-633. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0642. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
2
Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.一次性使用软性输尿管镜与可重复使用输尿管镜治疗儿童尿石症的比较。
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Jun;19(3):248.e1-248.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
3
Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.软性输尿管镜维修的成本分析:基于社区医疗实践的655例手术评估
J Endourol. 2016 Mar;30(3):254-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0642. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
4
Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.新型一次性使用数字柔性输尿管镜与非一次性使用纤维光学和数字输尿管镜在尸体模型中的比较。
J Endourol. 2016 Jun;30(6):655-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0051. Epub 2016 May 2.
5
A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.一项前瞻性病例对照研究:比较一次性使用的软性可抛弃输尿管镜LithoVue与软性可重复使用的纤维光学输尿管镜。
J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):468-475. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0027. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
6
Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.微观成本分析表明,与可重复使用的软性纤维输尿管镜相比,LithoVue的成本相当。
J Endourol. 2018 Apr;32(4):267-273. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0523. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
Identifying factors associated with need for flexible ureteroscope repair: a Western Endourology STone (WEST) research consortium prospective cohort study.确定与软性输尿管镜修复需求相关的因素:西方腔内泌尿学结石(WEST)研究联盟前瞻性队列研究。
Urolithiasis. 2018 Nov;46(6):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1013-y. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
8
Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.一次性使用与可重复使用的数字式软性输尿管镜:前瞻性对比研究。
Int J Urol. 2019 Oct;26(10):999-1005. doi: 10.1111/iju.14091. Epub 2019 Aug 25.
9
Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.一次性使用数码输尿管软镜:一项离体评估和成本分析。
BJU Int. 2018 May;121 Suppl 3:55-61. doi: 10.1111/bju.14235.
10
Defining the Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope Reprocessing Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing.使用时间驱动作业成本法确定可重复使用软性输尿管镜再处理的成本
J Endourol. 2017 Oct;31(10):1026-1031. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0463. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Borescope Inspections on Endoscope Repair Frequency and Costs.管道内窥镜检查对内镜维修频率和成本的影响。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2024;58(4):88-98. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-58.4.88. Epub 2024 Nov 22.