Dimberg U
Biol Psychol. 1986 Feb;22(1):37-57. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(86)90019-0.
Several lines of evidence suggest that emotional responses to facial expressions of emotion have a biological basis. The present study involved 4 experiments where pictures of angry, happy or neutral facial expressions were used as conditioned stimuli in aversive Pavlovian electrodermal conditioning. From an evolutionary perspective it was expected that an angry face should have an excitatory effect on aversively conditioned responses, whereas a happy face should have an inhibitory effect. It was also expected that the effect should be specific for the stimulus person showing the display. The data showed that the stimulus person was a critical mediating factor for obtaining persistent conditioning effects, that is to say, responses which showed resistance to extinction. Persistent responding was primarily manifested when the stimulus person displayed anger during extinction. On the other hand, this effect was inhibited when the person displayed a happy face during extinction. Furthermore, resistance to extinction was increased or decreased dependent on whether the person expressed anger or happiness during acquisition. Thus, consistent with predictions, angry and happy faces exhibited an excitatory and inhibitory effect, respectively, and these effects were mediated by the stimulus person.
多条证据表明,对情绪面部表情的情绪反应具有生物学基础。本研究包含4个实验,其中愤怒、快乐或中性面部表情的图片被用作厌恶巴甫洛夫式皮肤电反应条件反射中的条件刺激。从进化的角度来看,预计愤怒的面孔会对厌恶条件反应产生兴奋作用,而快乐的面孔会产生抑制作用。还预计这种效应对于展示表情的刺激人物应该是特定的。数据表明,刺激人物是获得持续条件作用效应(即表现出对消退有抵抗力的反应)的关键中介因素。当刺激人物在消退过程中表现出愤怒时,持续反应主要表现出来。另一方面,当人物在消退过程中表现出快乐的面孔时,这种效应会受到抑制。此外,对消退的抵抗力会根据人物在习得过程中表达愤怒还是快乐而增加或减少。因此,与预测一致,愤怒和快乐的面孔分别表现出兴奋和抑制作用,并且这些作用是由刺激人物介导的。