Ohman A, Dimberg U
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1978 Nov;36(11):1251-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.36.11.1251.
Converging data suggest that human facial behavior has an evolutionary basis. Combining these data with Seligman's preparedness theory, it was predicted that facial expressions of anger should be more readily associated with aversive events than should expressions of happiness. Two experiments involving differential electrodermal conditioning to pictures of faces, with electric shock as the unconditioned stimulus, were performed. In the first experiment, the subjects were exposed to two pictures of the same person, one with an angry and one with a happy expression. For half of the subjects, the shock followed the angry face, and for the other half, it followed the happy face. In the second experiment, three groups of subjects differentiated between pictures of male and female faces, both showing angry, neutral, and happy expressions. Responses to angry conditioned stimuli showed significant resistance to extinction in both experiments, with a larger effect in Experiment 2. Responses to happy or neutral conditioned stimuli, on the other hand, extinguished immediately when the shock was withheld. The results are related to conditioning to phobic stimuli and to the preparedness theory.
越来越多的数据表明,人类的面部行为具有进化基础。将这些数据与塞利格曼的准备理论相结合,研究人员预测,与快乐表情相比,愤怒表情应该更容易与厌恶事件联系在一起。研究人员进行了两项实验,以面部图片为条件刺激,电击为无条件刺激,对皮肤电反应进行差异条件反射训练。在第一个实验中,受试者观看同一个人的两张图片,一张是愤怒表情,另一张是快乐表情。对于一半的受试者,电击在愤怒表情图片之后出现;对于另一半受试者,电击在快乐表情图片之后出现。在第二个实验中,三组受试者区分男性和女性面部图片,这些图片均呈现愤怒、中性和快乐表情。在两个实验中,对愤怒条件刺激的反应均表现出对消退的显著抵抗力,在实验2中效果更明显。另一方面,当停止电击时,对快乐或中性条件刺激的反应立即消退。这些结果与对恐惧刺激的条件反射以及准备理论有关。