Comparison of intra- and inter-patient intensity standardization methods for multi-parametric whole-body MRI.

To test and compare different intensity standardization approaches for whole-body multi-parametric MR images, aiming to compensate voxel intensity differences between scans. These differences, common for magnetic resonance imaging, pose problems in image quantification, assessment of changes between a baseline and follow-up scan, and hinder performance of image processing and machine learning algorithms.In this work, we present a comparison on the accuracy of intensity standardization approaches with increasing complexity, for intra- and inter-patient multi-parametric whole-body MRI. Several approaches were used: z-scoring of the intensities, piecewise linear mapping and deformable mapping of intensity distributions into established reference intensity space. For each method, the impact on standardization algorithm on the use of single image or average population distribution reference; as well as, whole image and region of interest were additionally investigated. All methods were validated on a data set of 18 whole-body anatomical and diffusion-weighted MR scans consisting of baseline and follow-up examinations acquired from advanced prostate cancer patients and healthy volunteers.The piecewise linear intensity standardisation approach provided the best compromise between standardization accuracy and method stability, with average deviations in intensity profile of 0.011-0.027 and mean absolute difference of 0.29-0.37 standard score (intra-patient) and 0.014-0.056 (inter-patient), depending on the type of used MR modality.Linear piecewise approaches showed the overall best performance across multiple validation metrics, mostly because of its robustness. The inter-patient standardization proved to perform better when using population average reference image; in contrary to intra-patient approach, where the best results were achieved by standardizing towards a reference image taken as the baseline scan.