• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表:阿根廷人结构效度的证据。

Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Evidence of Construct Validity in Argentinians.

作者信息

Flores-Kanter Pablo Ezequiel, Alesandrini Claudia, Alvarado Jesús M

机构信息

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina & Centro de Bioética, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina.

Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;13(3):198. doi: 10.3390/bs13030198.

DOI:10.3390/bs13030198
PMID:36975223
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10045144/
Abstract

Suicide is a global public health problem. The goal of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the measurement of suicide severity based on the Columbia suicide severity rating scale. We worked with a sample of 516 Argentinean adults, aged 18 to 75. The fit of a measurement model that differentiates between the various degrees of suicidal severity was verified. The specified model returns fit values above the suggested cut-off points, both for the occurrence and frequency indicators. The internal consistency indices from the composite reliability coefficient also show values above the cut-off points for both occurrence and frequency. Finally, evidence of construct validity was obtained from the relationship with external variables. The results are consistent with the theory, showing stronger effects of hopelessness on suicidal ideation compared to suicide attempts. Overall, evidence of construct validity for the measurement of suicidal severity is presented, a contribution that is essential in remedying the lack of studies on suicide in the region and promoting prevention strategies.

摘要

自杀是一个全球性的公共卫生问题。本研究的目的是评估基于哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表对自杀严重程度测量的心理测量特性。我们对516名年龄在18至75岁之间的阿根廷成年人进行了抽样研究。验证了区分不同程度自杀严重程度的测量模型的拟合度。对于发生指标和频率指标,指定模型返回的拟合值均高于建议的临界点。综合信度系数的内部一致性指标在发生和频率方面也显示出高于临界点的值。最后,从与外部变量的关系中获得了结构效度的证据。结果与理论一致,表明绝望对自杀意念的影响比对自杀未遂的影响更强。总体而言,本研究提供了自杀严重程度测量的结构效度证据,这一贡献对于弥补该地区自杀研究的不足以及促进预防策略至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b1/10045144/691920ab3317/behavsci-13-00198-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b1/10045144/c13852c71292/behavsci-13-00198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b1/10045144/ccde4b5a1a6d/behavsci-13-00198-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b1/10045144/9cbadda7153d/behavsci-13-00198-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b1/10045144/691920ab3317/behavsci-13-00198-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b1/10045144/c13852c71292/behavsci-13-00198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b1/10045144/ccde4b5a1a6d/behavsci-13-00198-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b1/10045144/9cbadda7153d/behavsci-13-00198-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b1/10045144/691920ab3317/behavsci-13-00198-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Evidence of Construct Validity in Argentinians.哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表:阿根廷人结构效度的证据。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;13(3):198. doi: 10.3390/bs13030198.
2
Linguistic adaptation and psychometric properties of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale among a heterogeneous sample of adolescents in Turkey.在土耳其的一个异质青少年样本中,哥伦比亚-自杀严重程度评定量表的语言适应性和心理计量学特性。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2019 Mar;54(2):115-132. doi: 10.1177/0091217418791454. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
3
The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults.哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表:三项包含青少年和成年人的多中心研究的初步有效性和内部一致性结果。
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;168(12):1266-77. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704.
4
Comparative Validation of the S-STS, the ISST-Plus, and the C-SSRS for Assessing the Suicidal Thinking and Behavior FDA 2012 Suicidality Categories.用于评估自杀性思维和行为的S-STS、ISST-Plus及C-SSRS的比较验证:FDA 2012年自杀倾向分类
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2014 Sep;11(9-10):32-46.
5
Psychometric Properties of a Persian Version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in Iranian Soldiers.哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)波斯语版本在伊朗士兵中的心理测量学特性
Iran J Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;19(3):295-305. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v19i3.15831.
6
Predictive Validity of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale for Short-Term Suicidal Behavior: A Danish Study of Adolescents at a High Risk of Suicide.哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表对短期自杀行为的预测效度:丹麦一项针对高自杀风险青少年的研究。
Arch Suicide Res. 2017 Jul 3;21(3):455-469. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2016.1222318. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
7
The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Has the "Gold Standard" Become a Liability?哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS):“金标准”是否已成为一种负担?
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2014 Sep;11(9-10):66-80.
8
Short term risk of non-fatal and fatal suicidal behaviours: the predictive validity of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale in a Swedish adult psychiatric population with a recent episode of self-harm.短期非致命和致命自杀行为风险:哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表在瑞典成年精神病患者近期自伤发作中的预测有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 1;18(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1883-8.
9
Psychometric validation of the Columbia-Suicide Severity rating scale in Spanish-speaking adolescents.哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表在讲西班牙语青少年中的心理测量学验证
Colomb Med (Cali). 2017 Dec 30;48(4):174-182. doi: 10.25100/cm.v43i4.2294.
10
Is a brief self-report version of the Columbia severity scale useful for screening suicidal ideation in Chilean adolescents?哥伦比亚严重程度量表的简短自评版本是否可用于智利青少年自杀意念的筛查?
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;88:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale among people with mental health diagnosis.心理健康诊断人群中哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表中文版的心理测量学特征
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07187-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Open Science in Suicide Research Is Open for Business.自杀研究中的开放科学已准备好开展业务。
Crisis. 2022 Sep;43(5):355-360. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000859. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
2
Implementation Science in Suicide Prevention.自杀预防中的实施科学
Crisis. 2022 Jan;43(1):1-7. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000846.
3
Neither Cronbach's Alpha nor McDonald's Omega: A Commentary on Sijtsma and Pfadt.既非克伦巴赫α系数也非麦克唐纳ω系数:对西茨马和普法特的评论
Psychometrika. 2021 Dec;86(4):877-886. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09801-1. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
4
Internal Structure of Beck Hopelessness Scale: An Analysis of Method Effects Using the CT-C(M-1) Model.贝克绝望量表的内部结构:使用 CT-C(M-1)模型分析方法效应。
J Pers Assess. 2022 May-Jun;104(3):408-416. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1942021. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
5
Advancing the Understanding of Suicide: The Need for Formal Theory and Rigorous Descriptive Research.推进自杀研究的理解:对形式理论和严谨描述性研究的需求。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Sep;24(9):704-716. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
6
Suicide and Suicide Prevention From a Global Perspective.从全球视角看自杀与自杀预防。
Crisis. 2020 Mar;41(Suppl 1):S3-S7. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000664.
7
Towards an Explanatory Model of Suicidal Ideation: The Effects of Cognitive Emotional Regulation Strategies, Affectivity and Hopelessness.迈向自杀意念解释模型:认知情绪调节策略、情感和绝望的影响。
Span J Psychol. 2019 Nov 4;22:E43. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.45.
8
Global, regional, and national burden of suicide mortality 1990 to 2016: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家自杀死亡率负担 1990 年至 2016 年:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
BMJ. 2019 Feb 6;364:l94. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l94.
9
Psychometric validation of the Columbia-Suicide Severity rating scale in Spanish-speaking adolescents.哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表在讲西班牙语青少年中的心理测量学验证
Colomb Med (Cali). 2017 Dec 30;48(4):174-182. doi: 10.25100/cm.v43i4.2294.
10
Development and Implementation of a Universal Suicide Risk Screening Program in a Safety-Net Hospital System.在一个安全网医院系统中开发并实施通用自杀风险筛查项目。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Jan;44(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Nov 22.