Rossi Alessandro Alberto, Pietrabissa Giada, Tagliagambe Andrea, Scuderi Anna, Montecchiani Lorenzo, Castelnuovo Gianluca, Mannarini Stefania, Dalla Ragione Laura
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, Section of Applied Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Interdepartmental Center for Family Research, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 21;13(3):276. doi: 10.3390/bs13030276.
. The present study employs a profile analysis to identify and compare psychological features and core eating disorder (ED) symptoms in clinical samples of patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and binge eating disorder (BED) and the general population (GP). A sample comprising 421 participants (142 patients with AN; 139 patients with BED; and 140 participants from the GP) was surveyed with the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3). Individuals with AN and BED were recruited and tested during their first week of a multidisciplinary inpatient program for weight loss and rehabilitation at the 'Rete DCA USL Umbria 1' (Eating Disorders Services), Italy. . The findings suggest distinct patterns of symptom presentation between the three samples across all the EDI-3 dimensions-with both the AN and BED groups scoring significantly higher than the GP. Patients with AN registered greater scores in all the psychological trait scales and the drive for thinness ED-specific dimension of the EDI-3 compared with their BED counterpart-which, instead, scored higher in the bulimia and body dissatisfaction subscales. These data support the transdiagnostic nature of the main risk factors for the onset and maintenance of EDs-which would vary in severity levels-and the existence of disease-specific pathways giving rise to AN and BED. . This study for the first time compares patients with AN and BED with a non-clinical sample on main ED psychological features. This might inform classification approaches and could have important implications for the development of prevention and early intervention programs.
本研究采用轮廓分析来识别和比较神经性厌食症(AN)、暴饮暴食症(BED)患者的临床样本以及普通人群(GP)的心理特征和核心饮食失调(ED)症状。使用饮食失调问卷-3(EDI-3)对421名参与者(142名AN患者;139名BED患者;140名来自普通人群)的样本进行了调查。AN和BED患者是在意大利“Rete DCA USL Umbria 1”(饮食失调服务机构)的多学科住院减肥和康复项目的第一周招募并进行测试的。研究结果表明,在EDI-3的所有维度上,三个样本的症状表现模式各不相同——AN组和BED组的得分均显著高于普通人群。与BED患者相比,AN患者在所有心理特质量表以及EDI-3中特定于追求瘦身的饮食失调维度上得分更高,而BED患者在贪食症和身体不满子量表上得分更高。这些数据支持了饮食失调发病和维持的主要风险因素具有跨诊断性质——其严重程度会有所不同——以及存在导致AN和BED的疾病特异性途径。这项研究首次将AN和BED患者与非临床样本在主要饮食失调心理特征方面进行了比较。这可能为分类方法提供信息,并可能对预防和早期干预项目的发展产生重要影响。