Geyer Abigail C, Draper Heather M, Wolf Lauren M, Buss Paige M, Dumkow Lisa E
Department of Pharmacy, Trinity Health Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2023 Nov 23;80(Suppl 4):S151-S156. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxad063.
The impact of pharmacist-led culture follow-up programs for positive cultures is well established. The benefits and feasibility of evaluating negative cultures and deprescribing unnecessary antibiotics after emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) visits are unknown; therefore, this evaluation characterized the burden of negative urine cultures and chlamydia tests and estimated how many potential antibiotic days could be saved with deprescribing.
This retrospective, descriptive study evaluated patients discharged from an ED or UC location with a pharmacist-led culture follow-up program. The primary objective was to characterize the proportion of patients with a negative urine culture or chlamydia test where an opportunity would exist to deprescribe antibiotics at follow-up. Secondary endpoints included estimating the number of potential antibiotic days that could be saved, postvisit healthcare utilization, and documented adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
For a 1-month period, pharmacists reviewed 398 cultures, of which 208 (52%) were urine cultures or chlamydia tests with negative results. Fifty patients (24%) with negative results had been prescribed empiric antibiotics. The median duration of antibiotic treatment was 7 days (interquartile range [IQR], 5-7 days), while the median time to culture finalization was 2 days (IQR, 1-2 days). There was an opportunity to save a median of 5 antibiotic days per patient. Thirty-two patients (15.3%) followed up with their primary care physician within 7 days; of these patients, 1 (0.05%) had their antibiotic prescription discontinued by the primary care physician. There were no documented ADRs.
Expansion of pharmacist-led culture follow-up programs to deprescribe antibiotics for patients with negative cultures has the potential to save significant antibiotic exposure.
由药剂师主导的针对阳性培养结果的文化随访项目的影响已得到充分证实。在急诊科(ED)和紧急护理(UC)就诊后评估阴性培养结果并停用不必要抗生素的益处和可行性尚不清楚;因此,本评估描述了阴性尿培养和衣原体检测的负担,并估计通过停用抗生素可节省多少潜在的抗生素使用天数。
这项回顾性描述性研究评估了参与由药剂师主导的文化随访项目的从ED或UC机构出院的患者。主要目标是描述尿培养或衣原体检测结果为阴性且在随访时有机会停用抗生素的患者比例。次要终点包括估计可节省的潜在抗生素使用天数、就诊后医疗保健利用率以及记录在案的药物不良反应(ADR)。
在1个月的时间里,药剂师审查了398份培养结果,其中208份(52%)是尿培养或衣原体检测,结果为阴性。50名(24%)结果为阴性的患者已接受经验性抗生素治疗。抗生素治疗的中位持续时间为7天(四分位间距[IQR],5 - 7天),而培养结果确定的中位时间为2天(IQR,1 - 2天)。每位患者平均有机会节省5天抗生素使用时间。32名患者(15.3%)在7天内对其初级保健医生进行了随访;在这些患者中,1名(0.05%)患者的抗生素处方被初级保健医生停用。没有记录在案的ADR。
将由药剂师主导的文化随访项目扩展到为培养结果阴性的患者停用抗生素,有可能显著减少抗生素暴露。