Dumkow Lisa E, Beuschel Thomas S, Brandt Kasey L
Department of Pharmacy Services, Mercy Health Saint Mary's, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Infect Dis Ther. 2017 Sep;6(3):453-459. doi: 10.1007/s40121-017-0168-8. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
Urgent care centers represent a high-volume outpatient setting where antibiotics are prescribed frequently but resources for antimicrobial stewardship may be scarce. In 2015, our pharmacist-led Emergency Department (ED) culture follow-up program was expanded to include two urgent care (UC) sites within the same health system. The UC program is conducted by ED and infectious diseases clinical pharmacists as well as PGY1 pharmacy residents using a collaborative practice agreement (CPA). The purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacist-led UC culture follow-up program and its impact on pharmacist workload.
This retrospective, descriptive study included all patients discharged to home from UC with a positive culture from any site resulting between 1 January and 31 December 2016. Data collected included the culture type, presence of intervention, and proportion of interventions made under the CPA. Additionally, pharmacist workload was reported as the number of call attempts made, new prescriptions written, and median time to complete follow-up per patient. Data were reported using descriptive statistics.
A total of 1461 positive cultures were reviewed for antibiotic appropriateness as part of the UC culture follow-up program, with 320 (22%) requiring follow-up intervention. Culture types most commonly requiring intervention were urine cultures (25%) and sexually transmitted diseases (25%). A median of 15 min was spent per intervention, with a median of one call (range 1-6 calls) needed to reach each patient. Less than half of patients required a new antimicrobial prescription at follow-up.
A pharmacist-led culture follow-up program conducted using a CPA was able to be expanded to UC sites within the same health system using existing clinical pharmacy staff along with PGY1 pharmacy residents. Service expansion resulted in minimal increase in pharmacist workload. Adding UC culture follow-up services to an existing ED program can allow health systems to expand antimicrobial stewardship initiatives to satellite locations.
急诊护理中心是一个高流量的门诊场所,抗生素在此处经常被开具处方,但抗菌药物管理的资源可能稀缺。2015年,我们由药剂师主导的急诊科(ED)培养随访项目扩大到同一医疗系统内的两个紧急护理(UC)站点。UC项目由急诊科和传染病临床药剂师以及PGY1药学住院医师通过合作医疗协议(CPA)开展。本研究的目的是描述由药剂师主导的UC培养随访项目及其对药剂师工作量的影响。
这项回顾性描述性研究纳入了2016年1月1日至12月31日期间从UC出院且任何部位培养结果呈阳性的所有患者。收集的数据包括培养类型、干预情况以及根据CPA进行干预的比例。此外,药剂师的工作量报告为呼叫尝试次数、开具的新处方数量以及每位患者完成随访的中位时间。数据采用描述性统计进行报告。
作为UC培养随访项目的一部分,共审查了1461份阳性培养结果以评估抗生素使用的合理性,其中320份(22%)需要进行随访干预。最常需要干预的培养类型是尿培养(25%)和性传播疾病(25%)。每次干预平均花费15分钟,联系每位患者平均需要拨打1次电话(范围为1 - 6次电话)。不到一半的患者在随访时需要开具新的抗菌药物处方。
使用CPA开展的由药剂师主导的培养随访项目能够利用现有的临床药学人员以及PGY1药学住院医师扩展到同一医疗系统内的UC站点。服务扩展导致药剂师工作量的增加最小。在现有的ED项目中增加UC培养随访服务可以使医疗系统将抗菌药物管理举措扩展到附属地点。