Suppr超能文献

健康的不活跃、耐力训练和力量训练受试者在等长次最大负荷任务期间腰椎背部肌肉的肌电图幅度-力量关系

EMG Amplitude-Force Relationship of Lumbar Back Muscles during Isometric Submaximal Tasks in Healthy Inactive, Endurance and Strength-Trained Subjects.

作者信息

Schönau Tim, Anders Christoph

机构信息

Division of Motor Research, Pathophysiology and Biomechanics, Experimental Trauma Surgery, Department for Hand, Reconstructive, and Trauma Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, 07743 Jena, Germany.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Feb 23;8(1):29. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8010029.

Abstract

Previous data suggest a correlation between the cross-sectional area of Type II muscle fibers and the degree of non-linearity of the EMG amplitude-force relationship (AFR). In this study we investigated whether the AFR of back muscles could be altered systematically by using different training modalities. We investigated 38 healthy male subjects (aged 19-31 years) who regularly performed either strength or endurance training (ST and ET, n = 13 each) or were physically inactive (controls (C), n = 12). Graded submaximal forces on the back were applied by defined forward tilts in a full-body training device. Surface EMG was measured utilizing a monopolar 4 × 4 quadratic electrode scheme in the lower back area. The polynomial AFR slopes were determined. Between-group tests revealed significant differences for ET vs. ST and C vs. ST comparisons at the medial and caudal electrode positions, but not for ET vs. C. Further, systematic main effects of the "electrode position" could be proven for ET and C groups with decreasing x coefficients from cranial to caudal and lateral to medial. For ST, there was no systematic main effect of the "electrode position". The results point towards training-related changes to the fiber-type composition of muscles in the strength-trained participants, particularly for their paravertebral region.

摘要

先前的数据表明,II型肌纤维的横截面积与肌电图振幅-力关系(AFR)的非线性程度之间存在相关性。在本研究中,我们调查了使用不同训练方式是否能系统性地改变背部肌肉的AFR。我们调查了38名健康男性受试者(年龄在19 - 31岁之间),他们定期进行力量训练或耐力训练(ST和ET,每组n = 13),或不进行体育活动(对照组(C),n = 12)。在全身训练设备中通过定义好的向前倾斜来施加背部的分级次最大力量。在下背部区域使用单极4×4方形电极方案测量表面肌电图。确定多项式AFR斜率。组间测试显示,在中间和尾部电极位置,ET与ST以及C与ST的比较存在显著差异,但ET与C的比较无显著差异。此外,对于ET组和C组,可以证明“电极位置”存在系统性主效应,从头部到尾部以及从外侧到内侧,x系数逐渐减小。对于ST组,“电极位置”没有系统性主效应。结果表明,力量训练参与者的肌肉纤维类型组成存在与训练相关的变化,尤其是在其椎旁区域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7010/10058474/49a5e4824dec/jfmk-08-00029-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验