Hansen Laura, Anders Christoph
Clinic for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Motor Research, Pathophysiology and Biomechanics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Physiol Rep. 2014 Dec 11;2(12). doi: 10.14814/phy2.12229. Print 2014 Dec 1.
Adequate training of the trunk muscles is essential to prevent low back pain. Although sit-ups are simple to perform, the perceived high effort is the reason why training the abdominal muscles is seldom continued over a longer period of time. It is well known that the abdominal muscles are inferior to the back muscles in terms of force, but this cannot explain the extreme difference in perceived effort between trunk flexion and extension tasks. Therefore, this study was aimed at the identification of control strategy influences on the muscular stress level. Thirty-nine subjects were investigated. The performed tasks were restricted to the sagittal plane and were implemented with simulated and realized tilt angles. Subjects were investigated in an upright position with their lower bodies fixed and their upper bodies free. Posture-controlled tasks involved graded forward and backward tilting, while force-controlled tasks involved the application of force based on a virtual tilt angle. The Surface EMG (SEMG) was taken from five trunk muscles on both sides. Control strategies seemed to have no systematic influence on the SEMG amplitudes of the back muscles. In contrast, the abdominal muscles exhibited significantly higher stress levels under posture-controlled conditions without relevantly increasing antagonistic co-activation of back muscles. The abdominal muscles' relative differences ranged from an average of 20% for the external oblique abdominal muscle to approximately 40% for the rectus abdominal muscle. The perceived high effort expended during sit-ups can now be explained by the posture-controlled contractions that are required.
对躯干肌肉进行充分训练对于预防腰痛至关重要。尽管仰卧起坐操作简单,但人们感觉其费力程度较高,这就是腹肌训练很少能长期持续进行的原因。众所周知,腹肌在力量方面不如背部肌肉,但这无法解释躯干屈伸任务中所感觉到的努力程度的巨大差异。因此,本研究旨在确定控制策略对肌肉应激水平的影响。对39名受试者进行了调查。所执行的任务仅限于矢状面,并通过模拟和实际倾斜角度来实施。受试者在固定下半身且上半身自由的直立姿势下接受调查。姿势控制任务包括分级向前和向后倾斜,而力控制任务则涉及根据虚拟倾斜角度施加力。从两侧的五块躯干肌肉采集表面肌电图(SEMG)。控制策略似乎对背部肌肉的SEMG振幅没有系统性影响。相比之下,在姿势控制条件下,腹肌表现出明显更高的应激水平,而背部肌肉的拮抗肌共激活没有相应增加。腹肌的相对差异范围从腹外斜肌的平均20%到腹直肌的约40%。现在可以通过所需的姿势控制收缩来解释仰卧起坐过程中感觉到的高努力程度。