Arm J P, Peile E B, Rainford D J
Br J Urol. 1986 Apr;58(2):218-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1986.tb09030.x.
In an evaluation of a chemical test for haematuria, all patients with positive results or a history of frank haematuria were investigated to determine the source of bleeding. In 10 of the 92 patients in whom the diagnosis was unknown at the time of admission, the presence of haematuria could not be confirmed. Of the remaining 82 patients urinary tract pathology was identified in 74. Of the other eight patients, four had exercise-induced haematuria with no other indications of significant pathology, and in four patients investigations stopped short of renal biopsy because of the patients' age.
在一项对血尿化学检测的评估中，所有检测结果呈阳性或有肉眼血尿病史的患者都接受了调查，以确定出血来源。在入院时诊断不明的92例患者中，有10例无法确认血尿的存在。在其余82例患者中，74例发现了尿路病变。在另外8例患者中，4例有运动性血尿，无其他重大病变迹象，4例患者因年龄原因未进行肾活检。
