School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Appetite. 2023 Jul 1;186:106548. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106548. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
Complementary feeding practices (CFPs) are associated with health outcomes (e.g., obesity and food allergies). Understanding how parents select foods for their infant is limited. This study's purpose was to develop a psychometrically sound measure of parents' food selection motives for their infant during the complementary feeding period.
Development and testing of the Parental Food Slection Questionnaire-Infant Version (PFSQ-I) occurred in three phases. English-speaking, U.S. mothers of healthy infants, aged 6-19 months old participated in a semi-structured, face-to-face interview (Phase 1) or a web-based survey (Phases 2 & 3). Phase 1 was a qualitative study of maternal beliefs and motives surrounding complementary feeding. Phase 2 involved adaptation and exploratory factor analysis of the original Food Choice Questionnaire (Steptoe et al., 1995). Phase 3 involved validity testing of the relationships among PFSQ-I factors and CFPs (timing/type of complementary food introduction, frequency of feeding method, usual texture intake, and allergenic food introduction) using bivariate analyses, and multiple linear and logistic regression analyses.
Mean maternal age was 30.4 years and infant age was 14.1 months (n = 381). The final structure of the PFSQ-I included 30 items and 7 factors: Behavioral Influence, Health Promotion, Ingredients, Affordability, Sensory Appeal, Convenience, and Perceived Threats (Cronbach's α = 0.68-0.83). Associations of factors with CFPs supported construct validity.
The PFSQ-I demonstrated strong initial psychometric properties in a sample of mothers from the U.S. Mothers who rated Behavioral Influence as more important were more likely to report suboptimal CFPs (e.g., earlier than recommended complementary food introduction, delayed allergenic food introduction, and prolonged use of spoon-feeding). Additional psychometric testing in a larger, more heterogenous sample is needed, along with examination of relationships between PFSQ-I factors and health outcomes.
补充喂养实践(CFP)与健康结果(例如肥胖和食物过敏)有关。了解父母如何为婴儿选择食物的情况有限。本研究的目的是开发一种在补充喂养期间父母为婴儿选择食物的心理测量学上合理的测量工具。
父母食物选择问卷-婴儿版(PFSQ-I)的开发和测试分为三个阶段。英语为母语的、美国 6-19 个月大的健康婴儿的母亲参加了半结构化的面对面访谈(第 1 阶段)或基于网络的调查(第 2 和第 3 阶段)。第 1 阶段是一项关于母亲在补充喂养方面的信念和动机的定性研究。第 2 阶段涉及对原始食物选择问卷(Steptoe 等人,1995 年)的改编和探索性因素分析。第 3 阶段涉及使用双变量分析和多元线性和逻辑回归分析来检验 PFSQ-I 因子与 CFP(补充食物引入的时间/类型、喂养方法的频率、常规质地摄入和过敏原食物引入)之间关系的有效性。
母亲的平均年龄为 30.4 岁,婴儿的年龄为 14.1 个月(n=381)。PFSQ-I 的最终结构包括 30 个项目和 7 个因素:行为影响、健康促进、成分、可负担性、感官吸引力、便利性和感知威胁(Cronbach 的α=0.68-0.83)。因子与 CFP 的关联支持结构有效性。
PFSQ-I 在来自美国的母亲样本中表现出良好的初步心理测量学特性。将行为影响评为更重要的母亲更有可能报告不太理想的 CFP(例如,比建议的补充食物引入更早、延迟引入过敏原食物和延长使用汤匙喂养)。需要在更大、更多样化的样本中进行更多的心理测量测试,并检查 PFSQ-I 因子与健康结果之间的关系。