Tufa Takele Beyene, Guta Asegid, Tufa Tafese B, Nigussie Dereje, Beyi Ashenafi Feyisa, Gutema Fanta D, Regassa Fikru
College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu P.O. Box 34, Ethiopia.
College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella P.O. Box 193, Ethiopia.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 14;12(3):570. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030570.
Antibiotics must be safe and effective for use in both human and veterinary medicine. However, information about the efficacy of different brands of antibiotics commonly used in veterinary practices is lacking in Ethiopia. In this study, we determined the efficacy of three brands of penicillin-streptomycin (Pen&strep, Penstrep, and Pro&strep) by performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing against isolated from cow milk from dairy farms in the towns of Sebata and Bishoftu, Central Ethiopia. We also assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of veterinarians regarding the quality and use of brand antibiotics and the antibiotic utilization practices of dairy farm personnel using a structured questionnaire. Of 43 isolated and tested, 33 (77%), 10 (23%), and 1 (2%) were susceptible to brands A, B, and C, respectively. According to the respondents, all of them reported that penstrep is the most prescribed antibiotic in dairy farms (100%), followed by oxytetracycline (78%) and sulfa drugs (52%). All veterinarians perceived that antibiotics imported from Western countries have a higher efficacy than those from Eastern countries, and they preferred brand A to the other brands, witnessing its better clinical outcome. The majority (87%) and a little more than half (53%) of the respondents perceived the overuse of antibiotics in veterinary clinics and dairy farms, respectively. Our study revealed the better efficacy of brand A against compared to the other brands. Interestingly, the veterinarians' perception of and preference toward the use of brand antibiotics agreed with the findings of our antibacterial susceptibility testing. The prudent use of brand A is critically important for sustaining effective treatment, avoiding the risk of antimicrobial resistance, and helping to address animal welfare issues.
抗生素必须在人类医学和兽医学中使用时都安全有效。然而,埃塞俄比亚缺乏关于兽医实践中常用的不同品牌抗生素疗效的信息。在本研究中,我们通过对从埃塞俄比亚中部塞巴塔镇和比绍夫图镇奶牛场采集的牛奶中分离出的[具体细菌名称未给出]进行抗菌药敏试验,来确定三种品牌的青霉素 - 链霉素(Pen&strep、Penstrep和Pro&strep)的疗效。我们还使用结构化问卷评估了兽医对品牌抗生素的质量和使用的知识、态度和实践(KAP),以及奶牛场工作人员的抗生素使用实践。在分离并测试的43株[具体细菌名称未给出]中,分别有33株(77%)、10株(23%)和1株(2%)对A、B和C品牌敏感。根据受访者的说法,他们都报告说Penstrep是奶牛场中最常开具的抗生素(100%),其次是土霉素(78%)和磺胺类药物(52%)。所有兽医都认为从西方国家进口的抗生素比从东方国家进口的抗生素疗效更高,并且他们更喜欢A品牌而不是其他品牌,因为其临床效果更好。大多数(87%)和略超过一半(53%)的受访者分别认为兽医诊所和奶牛场存在抗生素过度使用的情况。我们的研究表明,与其他品牌相比,A品牌对[具体细菌名称未给出]的疗效更好。有趣的是,兽医对品牌抗生素使用的认知和偏好与我们抗菌药敏试验的结果一致。谨慎使用A品牌对于维持有效治疗、避免抗菌药物耐药性风险以及帮助解决动物福利问题至关重要。