Bovo Federica, Lazzarotto Tiziana, Ambretti Simone, Gaibani Paolo
Microbiology Operative Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 20;12(3):614. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030614.
The aim of this study was to compare the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method with the Disk Diffusion (DD) test and strip test against a collection of 75 well-characterized carbapenemase (KPC)-producing (KPC-Kp) clinical strains to assess cefiderocol (CFD) antimicrobial activity. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on KPC-Kp strains by Illumina iSeq100 platform. The Categorical Agreement (CA) between the BMD method and DD test was 92% (69/75) with a Major Error (ME) of 16.7% (6/36). Additionally, the CA between the BMD method and test strip was 90.7% (68/75) with a Very Major Error (VME) of 17.9% (7/39) and 82.7% (62/75) between the strip test and DD with a ME of 30.2%. KPC-Kp strains showing resistance to CFD were 27 out of 75 (36%) by three methods. Specifically, 51.9% (14/27) of KPC-Kp resistant to CFD harbored , while 48.1% (13/27) harbored mutated . Moreover, KPC-Kp strains carrying a mutated gene exhibited high MIC values ( value < 0.001) compared to wild-type . In conclusion, the DD test resulted as a valid alternative to the BMD method to determine the in vitro susceptibility to CFD, while the strip test exhibited major limitations.
本研究的目的是将参考肉汤微量稀释(BMD)法与纸片扩散(DD)试验和纸条试验进行比较,以检测75株特征明确的产碳青霉烯酶(KPC)的临床菌株(KPC-Kp),评估头孢地尔(CFD)的抗菌活性。通过Illumina iSeq100平台对KPC-Kp菌株进行全基因组测序。BMD法与DD试验之间的分类一致性(CA)为92%(69/75),主要误差(ME)为16.7%(6/36)。此外,BMD法与试纸条之间的CA为90.7%(68/75),非常主要误差(VME)为17.9%(7/39),试纸条试验与DD试验之间的CA为82.7%(62/75),ME为30.2%。三种方法检测出75株KPC-Kp菌株中有27株(36%)对CFD耐药。具体而言,对CFD耐药的KPC-Kp菌株中,51.9%(14/27)携带 ,而48.1%(13/27)携带突变的 。此外,与野生型 相比,携带突变 基因的KPC-Kp菌株表现出较高的最低抑菌浓度值( 值<0.001)。总之,DD试验是测定CFD体外敏感性的BMD法的有效替代方法,而纸条试验存在主要局限性。