Xue Licheng, Zhao Jing, Weng Xuchu
Key Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou 510599, China.
Institute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510599, China.
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 22;13(3):379. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030379.
Neural tuning for print refers to differential neural responses (e.g., the N1 component of event-related potentials) to different orthographic forms and other visual stimuli. While impaired neural tuning for print has been well established in dyslexic children who read alphabetic scripts, it remains unclear whether such effects exist in dyslexic children who read Chinese, which dramatically differs in visual and linguistic characteristics from alphabetic words. To fill this gap, we examined two levels of the neural tuning for print: coarse tuning (i.e., false character vs. stroke combination), and fine tuning (i.e., sub-lexical tuning: pseudo character vs. false character; and lexical tuning: real character vs. pseudo character). Using the event-related potential technique, we examined 14 typically developing children and 16 dyslexic children who were screened from 216 nine-year-old children in the third grade. For typically developing children, we observed both coarse and sub-lexical tuning. Critically, for dyslexic children, we found stronger N1 for false character than for stroke combination, suggesting intact coarse tuning, but a reduced N1 difference between false character and pseudo character, suggesting impaired sub-lexical tuning. These results clearly show selective impairments in fine neural tuning at the sub-lexical level in Chinese dyslexic children. Our findings may be associated with unique features of Chinese characters.
对文字的神经调谐是指对不同正字法形式和其他视觉刺激的差异神经反应(例如,事件相关电位的N1成分)。虽然在阅读字母文字的诵读困难儿童中,对文字的神经调谐受损已得到充分证实,但对于阅读中文的诵读困难儿童是否存在这种影响仍不清楚,中文在视觉和语言特征上与字母文字有很大不同。为了填补这一空白,我们研究了对文字的神经调谐的两个层面:粗调谐(即假字与笔画组合)和微调谐(即次词汇调谐:假字与伪字;以及词汇调谐:真字与伪字)。使用事件相关电位技术,我们研究了14名发育正常的儿童和16名诵读困难儿童,这些儿童是从216名三年级九岁儿童中筛选出来的。对于发育正常的儿童,我们观察到了粗调谐和次词汇调谐。关键的是,对于诵读困难儿童,我们发现假字的N1比笔画组合的更强,这表明粗调谐完好无损,但假字和伪字之间的N1差异减小,这表明次词汇调谐受损。这些结果清楚地表明,中文诵读困难儿童在次词汇水平的精细神经调谐存在选择性损伤。我们的发现可能与汉字的独特特征有关。