Shen Beiyi, Hou Wei, Jiang Zhao, Li Haifang, Singer Adam J, Hoshmand-Kochi Mahsa, Abbasi Almas, Glass Samantha, Thode Henry C, Levsky Jeffrey, Lipton Michael, Duong Tim Q
Department of Radiology, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 15;13(6):1107. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061107.
This study evaluated the temporal characteristics of lung chest X-ray (CXR) scores in COVID-19 patients during hospitalization and how they relate to other clinical variables and outcomes (alive or dead). This is a retrospective study of COVID-19 patients. CXR scores of disease severity were analyzed for: (i) survivors ( = 224) versus non-survivors ( = 28) in the general floor group, and (ii) survivors ( = 92) versus non-survivors ( = 56) in the invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) group. Unpaired -tests were used to compare survivors and non-survivors and between time points. Comparison across multiple time points used repeated measures ANOVA and corrected for multiple comparisons. For general-floor patients, non-survivor CXR scores were significantly worse at admission compared to those of survivors ( < 0.05), and non-survivor CXR scores deteriorated at outcome ( < 0.05) whereas survivor CXR scores did not ( > 0.05). For IMV patients, survivor and non-survivor CXR scores were similar at intubation ( > 0.05), and both improved at outcome ( < 0.05), with survivor scores showing greater improvement ( < 0.05). Hospitalization and IMV duration were not different between groups ( > 0.05). CXR scores were significantly correlated with lactate dehydrogenase, respiratory rate, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin, SpO2, and lymphocyte count ( < 0.05). Longitudinal CXR scores have the potential to provide prognosis, guide treatment, and monitor disease progression.
本研究评估了COVID-19患者住院期间肺部胸部X线(CXR)评分的时间特征,以及这些特征与其他临床变量和结局(存活或死亡)之间的关系。这是一项对COVID-19患者的回顾性研究。分析了疾病严重程度的CXR评分:(i)普通病房组中的幸存者(n = 224)与非幸存者(n = 28),以及(ii)有创机械通气(IMV)组中的幸存者(n = 92)与非幸存者(n = 56)。采用非配对t检验比较幸存者和非幸存者以及不同时间点之间的差异。对多个时间点进行比较时使用重复测量方差分析,并对多重比较进行校正。对于普通病房患者,与幸存者相比,非幸存者入院时的CXR评分明显更差(P < 0.05),且在结局时非幸存者的CXR评分恶化(P < 0.05),而幸存者的CXR评分没有恶化(P > 0.05)。对于IMV患者,插管时幸存者和非幸存者的CXR评分相似(P > 0.05),且在结局时两者均有所改善(P < 0.05),幸存者的评分改善更为明显(P < 0.05)。两组之间的住院时间和IMV持续时间没有差异(P > 0.05)。CXR评分与乳酸脱氢酶、呼吸频率、D-二聚体、C反应蛋白、降钙素原、铁蛋白、SpO2和淋巴细胞计数显著相关(P < 0.05)。纵向CXR评分有可能提供预后信息、指导治疗并监测疾病进展。