Ikumi Akira, Yoshii Yuichi, Iwahashi Yuta, Sashida Satoshi, Shrestha Pragyan, Xie Chun, Kitahara Itaru, Ishii Tomoo
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tsukuba University Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8576, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ami 300-0395, Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;13(6):1141. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061141.
To improve the accuracy of a 3D bone position estimation system that displays 3D images in response to changes in the position of fluoroscopic images, modified markers using quick response (QR) codes were developed. The aims of this study were to assess the accuracy of the estimated bone position on 3D images with reference to QR code markers on fluoroscopic images and to compare its accuracy with metal bead markers. Bone positions were estimated from reference points on a fluoroscopic image compared with those on a 3D image. The positional relationships of QR code and metal bead markers on the fluoroscopic image were compared with those on the 3D image in order to establish whether a 3D image may be drawn by tracking positional changes in radius models. Differences were investigated by comparing the distance between markers on the fluoroscopic image and that on the 3D image, which was projected on the monitor. The error ratio, which was defined as the difference in the measurement between the fluoroscopic and 3D images divided by the fluoroscopic measurement, was compared between QR code and metal bead markers. Error ratios for the QR code markers were 5.0 ± 2.0%, 6.4 ± 7.6%, and 1.0 ± 0.8% in the anterior-posterior view, ulnar side lateral view, and posterior-anterior view, respectively. Error ratios for the metal bead markers were 1.3 ± 1.7%, 13.8 ± 14.5%, and 4.7 ± 5.7% in the anterior-posterior view, ulnar side lateral view, and posterior-anterior view, respectively. The error ratio for the metal bead markers was smaller in the initial position ( < 0.01). However, the error ratios for the QR code markers were smaller in the lateral position and the posterior-anterior position ( < 0.05). In QR code marker tracking, tracking was successful even with discontinuous images. The accuracy of a 3D bone position estimation was increased by using the QR code marker system. QR code marker tracking facilitates real-time comparisons of dynamic changes in preoperative 3D and intraoperative fluoroscopic images.
为提高一种3D骨位置估计系统的准确性,该系统可根据荧光透视图像的位置变化显示3D图像,开发了使用二维码(QR码)的改良标记物。本研究的目的是参照荧光透视图像上的QR码标记物评估3D图像上估计骨位置的准确性,并将其准确性与金属珠标记物进行比较。根据荧光透视图像上的参考点与3D图像上的参考点比较来估计骨位置。为确定是否可通过跟踪桡骨模型的位置变化来绘制3D图像,将荧光透视图像上QR码和金属珠标记物的位置关系与3D图像上的进行比较。通过比较荧光透视图像上标记物与投影在显示器上的3D图像上标记物之间的距离来研究差异。将误差率(定义为荧光透视图像与3D图像测量值之差除以荧光透视测量值)在QR码和金属珠标记物之间进行比较。QR码标记物在前-后视图、尺侧侧视图和后-前视图中的误差率分别为5.0±2.0%、6.4±7.6%和1.0±0.8%。金属珠标记物在前-后视图、尺侧侧视图和后-前视图中的误差率分别为1.3±1.7%、13.8±14.5%和4.7±5.7%。金属珠标记物在初始位置的误差率较小(<0.01)。然而,QR码标记物在侧位和后-前位的误差率较小(<0.05)。在QR码标记物跟踪中,即使图像不连续跟踪也能成功。使用QR码标记物系统提高了3D骨位置估计的准确性。QR码标记物跟踪有助于实时比较术前3D图像和术中荧光透视图像的动态变化。