Boyer Jérémy, Bartoli Axel, Deharo Pierre, Vaillier Antoine, Ferrara Jérôme, Barral Pierre-Antoine, Jaussaud Nicolas, Morera Pierre, Porto Alizée, Collart Frédéric, Jacquier Alexis, Cuisset Thomas
Département de Cardiologie, CHU Timone, 13005 Marseille, France.
Department of Radiology, CHU Timone, AP-HM, 264, Rue Saint-Pierre, 13005 Marseille, France.
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 15;12(6):2285. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062285.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) screening is usually performed before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Computed coronary tomography angiography (CCTA) has shown good diagnostic performance for CAD screening in patients with a low probability of CAD and is systematically performed before TAVI. CCTA could be an efficient alternative to ICA for CAD screening before TAVI. We sought to investigate the diagnostic performance of CCTA in a population of unselected patients without known CAD who were candidates for TAVI. All consecutive patients referred to our center for TAVI without known CAD were enrolled. All patients underwent CCTA and ICA, which were considered the gold standard. A statistical analysis of the diagnostic performance per patient and per artery was performed. 307 consecutive patients were enrolled. CCTA was non-analyzable in 25 patients (8.9%). In the per-patient analysis, CCTA had a sensitivity of 89.6%, a specificity of 90.2%, a positive predictive value of 65.15%, and a negative predictive value of 97.7%. Only five patients were classified as false negatives on the CCTA. Despite some limitations of the study, CCTA seems reliable for CAD screening in patients without known CAD who are candidates for TAVI. By using CCTA, ICA could be avoided in patients with a CAD-RADS score ≤ 2, which represents 74.8% of patients.
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)筛查通常在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)前通过有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)进行。计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CCTA)已显示出在CAD可能性较低的患者中对CAD筛查具有良好的诊断性能,并且在TAVI前被系统地应用。对于TAVI前的CAD筛查,CCTA可能是ICA的一种有效替代方法。我们试图研究CCTA在未选择的、无已知CAD且为TAVI候选者人群中的诊断性能。所有连续转诊至我们中心进行TAVI且无已知CAD的患者均被纳入研究。所有患者均接受了CCTA和被视为金标准的ICA检查。对每位患者和每条动脉的诊断性能进行了统计分析。共纳入307例连续患者。25例患者(8.9%)的CCTA无法分析。在患者层面分析中,CCTA的敏感性为89.6%,特异性为90.2%,阳性预测值为65.15%,阴性预测值为97.7%。CCTA上仅有5例患者被分类为假阴性。尽管该研究存在一些局限性,但对于无已知CAD且为TAVI候选者的患者,CCTA在CAD筛查方面似乎是可靠的。通过使用CCTA,CAD-RADS评分≤2的患者(占患者总数的74.8%)可以避免进行ICA检查。