Suppr超能文献

基于菌丝体的复合材料:接受度研究。

Mycelium-Based Composite Materials: Study of Acceptance.

作者信息

Bonenberg Agata, Sydor Maciej, Cofta Grzegorz, Doczekalska Beata, Grygorowicz-Kosakowska Klaudia

机构信息

Institute of Interior Design and Industrial Design, Faculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology, 61-131 Poznań, Poland.

Department of Woodworking and Fundamentals of Machine Design, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;16(6):2164. doi: 10.3390/ma16062164.

Abstract

Mycelium-based composites (MBCs) are alternative biopolymers for designing sustainable furniture and other interior elements. These innovative biocomposites have many ecological advantages but present a new challenge in aesthetics and human product acceptance. Grown products, made using living mycelium and lignocellulosic substrates, are porous, have irregular surfaces and have irregular coloring. The natural origin of these types of materials and the fear of fungus can be a challenge. This research investigated the level of human acceptance of the new material. Respondents were students of architecture who can be considered as people involved in interior design and competent in the design field. Research has been performed on the authors' prototype products made from MBCs. Three complementary consumer tests were performed. The obtained results measured the human reactions and demonstrated to which extents products made of MBCs were "likeable" and their nonobvious aesthetics were acceptable to the public. The results showed that MBC materials generally had a positive or not-negative assessment. The responses after the pairwise comparison of the MBC with wall cladding samples pointed out the advantage of ceramic reference material above the MBC based on an overall assessment. The respondents also believed that the chamotte clay cladding would be easier to fit into the aesthetics of a modern interior and would in better accordance with its style. Although the MBC was less visually appealing, the respondents nevertheless found it more interesting, original, and environmentally friendly. The experiments suggested that the respondents had double standards regarding MBCs. MBCs were generally accepted as ecological, but not in their own homes. All of these results support current and future applications of MBCs for manufacturing items where enhanced aesthetics are required.

摘要

基于菌丝体的复合材料(MBCs)是用于设计可持续家具和其他室内元素的替代性生物聚合物。这些创新的生物复合材料具有许多生态优势,但在美学和人类对产品的接受度方面提出了新的挑战。使用活菌丝体和木质纤维素基质制成的生长型产品具有多孔性、表面不规则且颜色不均。这类材料的天然来源以及对真菌的恐惧可能是一个挑战。本研究调查了人类对这种新材料的接受程度。受访者是建筑专业的学生,他们可被视为参与室内设计且在设计领域有能力的人群。研究针对作者用MBCs制作的原型产品进行。进行了三项互补的消费者测试。所获结果测量了人类的反应,并表明由MBCs制成的产品在多大程度上是“讨人喜欢的”,以及其不明显的美学是否为公众所接受。结果表明,MBC材料总体上得到了积极或非负面的评价。将MBC与墙面覆层样品进行成对比较后的回应指出,基于总体评估,陶瓷参考材料优于MBC。受访者还认为,烧粘土覆层更容易融入现代室内美学,且更符合其风格。尽管MBC在视觉上吸引力较小,但受访者仍觉得它更有趣、更具原创性且更环保。实验表明,受访者对MBCs存在双重标准。MBCs通常被认为是生态的,但不会用于他们自己的家中。所有这些结果都支持了MBCs在当前和未来制造需要增强美学效果的物品方面的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7f1/10051586/5870a85d04ee/materials-16-02164-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验