University of Tsukuba Hospital Hitachi Social Cooperation Education Research Center, Hitachi 317-0077, Ibaraki, Japan.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 17;59(3):601. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030601.
Therapeutic options with immunosuppressive agents for glomerular diseases have widened with refinements to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines from 2012 to 2021. However, international guidelines do not necessarily match the reality in each country. Expensive therapies such as rituximab and calcineurin inhibitors are sometimes inaccessible to patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome due to cost or regulations. Under the Japanese medical insurance system, rituximab is accessible but still limited to steroid-dependent patients who developed idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in childhood. Based on international KDIGO guidelines and other national guidelines, possible applications of immunosuppressive agents for nephrotic syndrome are comprehensively examined in this review. While rituximab has become the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy for nephrotic syndrome, clinical trials have indicated that options such as cyclophosphamide, calcineurin inhibitors, and mycophenolate mofetil would be preferable. Given the rising number of patients with nephrotic syndrome worldwide, KDIGO guidelines mention the need for further consideration of cost-effectiveness. If the new option of rituximab is to be the first choice in combination with steroids for nephrotic syndrome, its cost-effectiveness should also be verified. Among the few studies examining the cost-effectiveness of treatments for nephrotic syndrome, administration of rituximab to young adults has been shown to be cost-beneficial, at least in Japan. However, further large-scale studies involving multiple facilities are needed to verify such findings. Network meta-analyses have concluded that the efficacy of rituximab remains controversial and confirmation through high-quality studies of large cohorts is needed. To this end, the mechanisms of action underlying immunosuppressive agents, both old and new, need to be understood and experience must be accumulated to evaluate possible effects and side effects.
治疗肾小球疾病的免疫抑制剂选择随着 2012 至 2021 年期间肾脏病改善全球结局(KDIGO)指南的细化而拓宽。然而,国际指南并不一定符合每个国家的实际情况。由于费用或规定,利妥昔单抗和钙调磷酸酶抑制剂等昂贵的治疗方法有时无法为难治性肾病综合征患者所获得。在日本医疗保险制度下,利妥昔单抗可获得,但仍仅限于依赖激素的儿童期特发性肾病综合征患者。基于国际 KDIGO 指南和其他国家指南,本文全面检查了免疫抑制剂在肾病综合征中的可能应用。虽然利妥昔单抗已成为肾病综合征免疫抑制治疗的主要药物,但临床试验表明,环磷酰胺、钙调磷酸酶抑制剂和霉酚酸酯等药物可能是更好的选择。鉴于世界各地肾病综合征患者数量不断增加,KDIGO 指南提到需要进一步考虑成本效益。如果利妥昔单抗作为肾病综合征联合激素治疗的首选药物,其成本效益也应得到验证。在少数评估肾病综合征治疗成本效益的研究中,利妥昔单抗给药对年轻成人是具有成本效益的,至少在日本是这样。然而,需要进行涉及多个机构的大规模研究来验证这些发现。网络荟萃分析得出结论,利妥昔单抗的疗效仍存在争议,需要通过大样本队列的高质量研究加以证实。为此,需要了解新旧免疫抑制剂的作用机制,并积累经验以评估可能的效果和副作用。