• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌根治术后 Gleason 评分升级的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Predictive Factors for Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients with Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital Zhuhai Hospital (Zhuhai Golden Bay Center Hospital), Zhuhai, China.

Department of Urology, Fuyang Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2023;107(5):460-479. doi: 10.1159/000528873. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1159/000528873
PMID:36990065
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have revealed that Gleason score upgrading (GSU) was closely related to an increased biochemical recurrence rate and adverse oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the predictive factors for GSU following radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

We performed an extensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane in September 2022. In order to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals, a fixed effect or a DerSimonian and Laird random effect was applied.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies included 18,745 PC patients that were available for further analysis. Our results revealed that GSU was significantly correlated with age (summary SMD = 0.13; p = 0.004), prostate volume (PV) (summary SMD = -0.19;p < 0.001), preoperative PSA (p-PSA) (summary SMD = 0.18; p < 0.001), PSA density (PSAD) (summary SMD = 0.40; p < 0.001), number of positive cores (summary SMD = 0.28; p = 0.001), percentage of positive cores (summary SMD = 0.36; p < 0.001), Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores (>3/≤3) (summary OR = 2.27; p = 0.001), clinical T stage (>T2/≤T2) (summary OR = 1.73; p < 0.001), positive surgical margins (PSM) (summary OR = 2.12; p < 0.001), extraprostatic extension (EPE) (summary OR = 2.73; p < 0.001), pathological T stage (>T2/≤T2) (summary OR = 3.45; p < 0.001), perineural invasion (PNI) (summary OR = 2.40; p = 0.008), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (summary SMD = 0.50; p < 0.001). However, we found that GSU was not significantly correlated with body mass index (BMI) (summary SMD = -0.02; p = 0.602). Moreover, our sensitivity and subgroup analyses showed that the findings were reliable.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, PV, p-PSA, PSAD, number of positive cores, percentage of positive cores, PI-RADS score, clinical T stage, PSM, EPE, pathological T stage, PNI, and NLR are independent factors predicting GSU following RP. The findings may be helpful in risk stratification and personalized treatment in PC patients.

摘要

简介

先前的研究表明,前列腺癌(PC)患者的 Gleason 评分升级(GSU)与生化复发率和不良肿瘤学结局密切相关。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定根治性前列腺切除术后(RP)GSU 的预测因素。

方法

我们于 2022 年 9 月使用 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 进行了广泛的文献检索。为了计算汇总优势比(OR)、标准化均数差(SMD)和 95%置信区间,采用固定效应或 DerSimonian 和 Laird 随机效应。

结果

26 项研究共纳入 18745 例 PC 患者,可进一步分析。我们的结果表明,GSU 与年龄(汇总 SMD=0.13;p=0.004)、前列腺体积(PV)(汇总 SMD=-0.19;p<0.001)、术前 PSA(p-PSA)(汇总 SMD=0.18;p<0.001)、PSA 密度(PSAD)(汇总 SMD=0.40;p<0.001)、阳性核心数(汇总 SMD=0.28;p=0.001)、阳性核心百分比(汇总 SMD=0.36;p<0.001)、前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分(>3/≤3)(汇总 OR=2.27;p=0.001)、临床 T 分期(>T2/≤T2)(汇总 OR=1.73;p<0.001)、阳性切缘(PSM)(汇总 OR=2.12;p<0.001)、前列腺外延伸(EPE)(汇总 OR=2.73;p<0.001)、病理 T 分期(>T2/≤T2)(汇总 OR=3.45;p<0.001)、神经周围侵犯(PNI)(汇总 OR=2.40;p=0.008)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)(汇总 SMD=0.50;p<0.001)显著相关。然而,我们发现 GSU 与体重指数(BMI)(汇总 SMD=-0.02;p=0.602)无显著相关性。此外,我们的敏感性和亚组分析表明,这些发现是可靠的。

结论

年龄、PV、p-PSA、PSAD、阳性核心数、阳性核心百分比、PI-RADS 评分、临床 T 分期、PSM、EPE、病理 T 分期、PNI 和 NLR 是 RP 后 GSU 的独立预测因素。这些发现可能有助于 PC 患者的风险分层和个体化治疗。

相似文献

1
Predictive Factors for Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients with Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前列腺癌根治术后 Gleason 评分升级的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol Int. 2023;107(5):460-479. doi: 10.1159/000528873. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
2
Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort.在中国队列中分析根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的危险因素。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7772-7780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4274. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Clinical and histopathological parameters in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies associated with tumor upgrading after radical prostatectomy: A comparative analysis of risk groups.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检与根治性前列腺切除术后肿瘤升级相关的临床和组织病理学参数:风险组的对比分析。
Prostate. 2024 Sep;84(12):1146-1156. doi: 10.1002/pros.24751. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度预测初始前列腺活检和前列腺切除术中 Gleason 评分升级的能力随着肿瘤分级的增加而降低,这是由于单位肿瘤体积的 PSA 分泌减少所致。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10681.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
5
Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins in Patients With Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前列腺癌根治术后切缘阳性的预测因素:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 8;10:539592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.539592. eCollection 2020.
6
Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.基于当代多核心前列腺活检的前列腺特异性抗原与前列腺特异性抗原密度对诊断为 Gleason 6 前列腺癌患者升级的预测作用。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E494-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11182.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
7
Predictors for clinically relevant Gleason score upgrade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.接受根治性前列腺切除术患者中临床相关 Gleason 评分升级的预测因素。
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(2):214-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10187.x. Epub 2011 May 18.
8
Prediction model of gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy based on a bayesian network.基于贝叶斯网络的前列腺根治术后格里森评分升级预测模型。
BMC Urol. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01330-6.
9
The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.前列腺穿刺活检标本中癌阳性核心的百分比强烈预测根治性前列腺切除术中的肿瘤分期和体积。
J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):174-8.
10
The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.前列腺穿刺活检癌灶在穿刺活检受累更严重一侧的百分比作为根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原复发的预测指标:来自共享平等准入区域癌症医院(SEARCH)数据库的结果
Cancer. 2003 Dec 1;98(11):2344-50. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11809.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse Pathology After Radical Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life.低危和中危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后的不良病理:长期健康相关生活质量的倾向评分匹配分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 6;15(15):1969. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151969.
2
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting Gleason score upgrade in prostate cancer.用于预测前列腺癌Gleason评分升级的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):1631-1644. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-178. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
3
Multiparametric MRI to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading and Downgrading at Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Presurgical Biopsy.
与术前活检相比,多参数磁共振成像预测前列腺癌根治术时Gleason评分的升级和降级
Korean J Radiol. 2025 May;26(5):422-434. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.1008. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
4
Establishing a model predicting Gleason grade group upgrading in prostate cancer.建立预测前列腺癌Gleason分级组升级的模型。
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1378-1387. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-155. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
5
Development and validation of a novel nomogram to avoid unnecessary biopsy in patients with PI-RADS category ≥ 4 lesions and PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml.开发和验证一种新的列线图,以避免在 PI-RADS 类别≥4 病变且 PSA≤20ng/ml 的患者中进行不必要的活检。
World J Urol. 2024 Aug 23;42(1):495. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05202-y.