• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测前列腺癌Gleason评分升级的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证

Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting Gleason score upgrade in prostate cancer.

作者信息

Li Shu-Feng, Zhao Jin-Ge, Jiang Chen-Yi, Wang Shi-Yuan, Liu Si-Yu, Zhang Yi-Jun, Zeng Hao, Zhao Fu-Jun

机构信息

Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):1631-1644. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-178. Epub 2025 Jun 26.

DOI:10.21037/tau-2025-178
PMID:40687645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12271951/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The high incidence of Gleason score upgrade (GSU) can lead urologists to underestimate tumor aggressiveness, resulting in suboptimal treatment decisions. This study aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning model to predict the risk of GSU in individuals with prostate cancer (PCa) based on readily available clinical parameters.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) at Shanghai General Hospital and West China Hospital. Data from Shanghai General Hospital were categorized into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%), while data from West China Hospital were used for external validation. Preoperative clinical and pathological data were collected. Nine machine learning models [including random forest (RF) and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM)], were developed, and the model demonstrating the best predictive performance was selected as the final model. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, decision curves, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpretation.

RESULTS

The LightGBM model demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving an area under the ROC curve of 84.53% in the test set and 76.61% in external validation. Significant factors associated with GSU included the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, age, clinical tumor stage (T stage), body mass index, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free-to-total PSA ratio (f/t PSA), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and bilateral tumor involvement. An online prediction tool was developed based on this model.

CONCLUSIONS

A machine learning model and an online prediction tool were developed to accurately predict GSU and identify factors associated with this process. This approach may assist clinicians in identifying individuals at high-risk for GSU and facilitating evidence-based treatment decisions.

摘要

背景

Gleason评分升级(GSU)的高发生率可能导致泌尿外科医生低估肿瘤侵袭性,从而做出次优的治疗决策。本研究旨在基于易于获得的临床参数,开发一种可解释的机器学习模型,以预测前列腺癌(PCa)患者发生GSU的风险。

方法

对在上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院和四川大学华西医院接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的患者进行回顾性分析。仁济医院的数据分为训练集(80%)和测试集(20%),华西医院的数据用于外部验证。收集术前临床和病理数据。开发了9种机器学习模型[包括随机森林(RF)和轻梯度提升机(LightGBM)],并选择表现最佳的模型作为最终模型。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线、决策曲线和SHapley值加法解释(SHAP)解释来评估模型性能。

结果

LightGBM模型表现出强大的预测性能,在测试集中ROC曲线下面积为84.53%,在外部验证中为76.61%。与GSU相关的显著因素包括国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级、年龄、临床肿瘤分期(T分期)、体重指数、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、游离PSA与总PSA比值(f/t PSA)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)以及双侧肿瘤累及情况。基于该模型开发了一个在线预测工具。

结论

开发了一种机器学习模型和一个在线预测工具,以准确预测GSU并识别与此过程相关的因素。这种方法可能有助于临床医生识别GSU高危个体,并促进基于证据的治疗决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/a97536291bb7/tau-14-06-1631-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/b46fc621f714/tau-14-06-1631-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/37b8fb16a07f/tau-14-06-1631-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/d2d7016525cf/tau-14-06-1631-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/56cae8825870/tau-14-06-1631-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/72b4d9b83ec6/tau-14-06-1631-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/fc33e29518ad/tau-14-06-1631-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/a97536291bb7/tau-14-06-1631-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/b46fc621f714/tau-14-06-1631-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/37b8fb16a07f/tau-14-06-1631-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/d2d7016525cf/tau-14-06-1631-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/56cae8825870/tau-14-06-1631-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/72b4d9b83ec6/tau-14-06-1631-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/fc33e29518ad/tau-14-06-1631-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/12271951/a97536291bb7/tau-14-06-1631-f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting Gleason score upgrade in prostate cancer.用于预测前列腺癌Gleason评分升级的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):1631-1644. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-178. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
3
Prediction of Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Population Using LightGBM and Cohort Validation of Its Clinical Value: Cross-Sectional and Retrospective Cohort Study.使用LightGBM预测非糖尿病人群的胰岛素抵抗及其临床价值的队列验证:横断面和回顾性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 13;13:e72238. doi: 10.2196/72238.
4
Interpretable machine learning for predicting isolated basal septal hypertrophy.用于预测孤立性基底间隔肥厚的可解释机器学习。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0325992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325992. eCollection 2025.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Development of machine learning model for predicting prolonged operation time in lumbar stenosis undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study.用于预测接受后路腰椎椎间融合术的腰椎管狭窄症患者手术时间延长的机器学习模型的开发:一项多中心研究。
Spine J. 2025 Mar;25(3):460-473. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
7
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
8
Development and validation of a machine learning-based clinical prediction model for monitoring liver injury in patients with pan-cancer receiving immunotherapy.基于机器学习的临床预测模型的开发与验证,用于监测接受免疫治疗的泛癌患者的肝损伤
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Jul 5;203:106036. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106036.
9
Mortality Risk Prediction in Patients With Antimelanoma Differentiation-Associated, Gene 5 Antibody-Positive, Dermatomyositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Algorithm Development and Validation.抗黑色素瘤分化相关基因5抗体阳性、皮肌炎相关间质性肺疾病患者的死亡风险预测:算法开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e62836. doi: 10.2196/62836.
10
Serum calcium-based interpretable machine learning model for predicting anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection: A multi-center study.基于血清钙的直肠癌切除术后吻合口漏预测可解释机器学习模型:一项多中心研究
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 May 21;31(19):105283. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i19.105283.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of Gleason Grading Group Upgrading in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients From Transperineal Biopsy After Radical Prostatectomy.经根治性前列腺切除术后经会阴前列腺穿刺活检低危前列腺癌患者 Gleason 分级分组升级的预测因素。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Jul;31(7):2838-2847. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
Can systemic immune-inflammation index and hematologic parameters aid in decision-making for active surveillance or curative treatment in low-risk prostate cancer?系统免疫炎症指数和血液学参数能否有助于低危前列腺癌的主动监测或治愈性治疗的决策?
Asian J Surg. 2024 Mar;47(3):1360-1365. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.11.126. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
Cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy versus transrectal ultrasonography-guided systematic biopsy: comparison and analysis of the risk of Gleason score upgrading.
认知融合靶向活检与经直肠超声引导下系统活检:Gleason评分升级风险的比较与分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Mar;56(3):981-988. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03848-y. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
4
The enlightening role of explainable artificial intelligence in medical & healthcare domains: A systematic literature review.可解释人工智能在医疗保健领域中的启示作用:系统文献综述。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Nov;166:107555. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107555. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
5
Prediction model of gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy based on a bayesian network.基于贝叶斯网络的前列腺根治术后格里森评分升级预测模型。
BMC Urol. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01330-6.
6
Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeting on Pathologic Upgrading and Downgrading at Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.磁共振成像靶向对前列腺切除术时病理升级和降级的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Aug;6(4):355-365. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 May 25.
7
Predictive Factors for Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients with Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前列腺癌根治术后 Gleason 评分升级的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol Int. 2023;107(5):460-479. doi: 10.1159/000528873. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
8
Role of inflammatory factors in prediction of Gleason score and its upgrading in localized prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.炎症因子在预测局限性前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后Gleason评分及其升级中的作用。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 12;12:1079622. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1079622. eCollection 2022.
9
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
10
Clinical Predictors of Grade Group Upgrading for Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Compared to Those of Preoperative Needle Biopsy Specimens.与术前穿刺活检标本相比,根治性前列腺切除术标本分级组升级的临床预测因素。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;12(11):2760. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112760.