Lapisatepun Worakitti, Junrungsee Sunhawit, Chotirosniramit Anon, Udomsin Kanya, Ko-Iam Wasana, Lapisatepun Warangkana, Siripongpon Kornpong, Kiratipaisarl Wuttipat, Bhanichvit Pan, Julphakee Thanyathorn
Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Excellence Center of Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Excellence Center of Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Clinical Surgical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Transplant Proc. 2023 Apr;55(3):597-605. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.02.056. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
The development of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is clinically challenging, especially in a low-volume transplant program. We evaluated the short-term outcomes of LDLT and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) to demonstrate the feasibility of performing LDLT in a low-volume transplant and/or high-volume complex hepatobiliary surgery program during the initial phase.
We conducted a retrospective study of LDLT and DDLT in Chiang Mai University Hospital from October 2014 to April 2020. Postoperative complications and 1-year survival were compared between the 2 groups.
Forty patients who underwent LT in our hospital were analyzed. There were 20 LDLT patients and 20 DDLT patients. The operative time and hospital stay were significantly longer in the LDLT group than in the DDLT group. The incidence of complications in both groups was comparable, except for biliary complications, which were higher in the LDLT group. Bile leakage, found in 3 patients (15%), is the most common complication in a donor. The 1-year survival rates of both groups were also comparable.
Even during the initial phase of the low-volume transplant program, LDLT and DDLT had comparable perioperative outcomes. Surgical expertise in complex hepatobiliary surgery is necessary to facilitate effective LDLT, potentially increasing case volumes and promoting program sustainability.
活体供肝肝移植(LDLT)的发展在临床上具有挑战性,尤其是在小容量移植项目中。我们评估了LDLT和尸体供肝肝移植(DDLT)的短期结局,以证明在初始阶段在小容量移植和/或大容量复杂肝胆外科手术项目中进行LDLT的可行性。
我们对2014年10月至2020年4月在清迈大学医院进行的LDLT和DDLT进行了回顾性研究。比较两组术后并发症和1年生存率。
分析了我院40例行肝移植的患者。其中LDLT患者20例,DDLT患者20例。LDLT组的手术时间和住院时间明显长于DDLT组。除胆系并发症在LDLT组较高外,两组并发症发生率相当。3例(15%)供体出现胆漏,是供体中最常见的并发症。两组的1年生存率也相当。
即使在小容量移植项目的初始阶段,LDLT和DDLT的围手术期结局也相当。复杂肝胆外科手术的专业技能对于促进有效的LDLT是必要的,这可能会增加病例数量并促进项目的可持续性。