Suppr超能文献

活体供肝与尸体供肝肝移植血管并发症的比较——一项系统评价与Meta分析

Comparison of Vascular Complications Between Living-donor and Deceased-donor Liver Transplantation - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Giri Suprabhat, Chandra Panigrahi Sarat, Mohapatra Vedavyas, Nath Preetam, Sahu Saroj K, Mallick Bipadabhanjan, Praharaj Dibya L, Anand Anil C

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Jan-Feb;15(1):102414. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102414. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vascular complications commonly cause graft loss and morbidity after liver transplantation (LT). Comparative data on the risk of vascular complications are limited. Hence, the present meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the difference in vascular complications between living-donor LT (LDLT) and deceased-donor LT (DDLT).

METHODS

A literature search of three databases was conducted for studies comparing the incidence of vascular complications with LDLT and DDLT. The event rates and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in the incidence of overall vascular complications (9.3%, 95% CI: 6.6-12.0 vs. 8.5%, 95% CI: 5.6-11.4) between LDLT and DDLT with OR 0.94 (95% CI: 0.73-1.21) (15 studies).There was a higher incidence of vascular complications with LDLT in older studies (published before 2013) but not in new studies. When comparing the individual complications, LDLT was associated with a higher incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) (3.8%, 95% CI: 2.4-5.2 vs. 1.6%, 95% CI: 1.1-2.2)with OR 2.20 (95% CI: 1.53-3.17) (14 studies)and a significantly lower incidence of intra-abdominal bleeding(4.8%, 95% CI: 3.3-6.2 vs. 7.9%, 95% CI: 5.0-10.7) with OR 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47-0.87) (11 studies). However, there was no difference in the incidence (2.1%, 95% CI: 0.5-3.8 vs. 1.0%, 95% CI: 0.1-1.9) of portal vein thrombosis between LDLT and DDLT with OR 1.85 (95% CI: 0.82-4.18) (6 studies).

CONCLUSION

Despite a comparable risk of vascular complications between LDLT and DDLT, LDLT was associated with a higher risk of HAT and a lower risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Further studies are required to analyze the effect of donor-recipient characteristics and surgical techniques on the risk of vascular complications.

摘要

背景

血管并发症是肝移植(LT)后移植物丢失和发病的常见原因。关于血管并发症风险的比较数据有限。因此,本荟萃分析旨在分析活体肝移植(LDLT)和尸体肝移植(DDLT)之间血管并发症的差异。

方法

对三个数据库进行文献检索,以寻找比较LDLT和DDLT血管并发症发生率的研究。使用随机效应模型计算事件发生率和95%置信区间(CI)的比值比(OR)。

结果

最终分析共纳入20项研究。LDLT和DDLT之间总体血管并发症的发生率没有差异(9.3%,95%CI:6.6 - 12.0 vs. 8.5%,95%CI:5.6 - 11.4),OR为0.94(95%CI:0.73 - 1.21)(15项研究)。在较旧的研究(2013年之前发表)中,LDLT的血管并发症发生率较高,但在新研究中并非如此。在比较个体并发症时,LDLT与肝动脉血栓形成(HAT)的发生率较高相关(3.8%,95%CI:2.4 - 5.2 vs. 1.6%,95%CI:1.1 - 2.2),OR为2.20(95%CI:1.53 - 3.17)(14项研究),而腹腔内出血的发生率显著较低(4.8%,95%CI:3.3 - 6.2 vs. 7.9%,95%CI:5.0 - 10.7),OR为0.64(95%CI:0.47 - 0.87)(11项研究)。然而,LDLT和DDLT之间门静脉血栓形成的发生率没有差异(2.1%,95%CI:0.5 - 3.8 vs. 1.0%,95%CI:0.1 - 1.9),OR为1.85(95%CI:0.

相似文献

10
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.

本文引用的文献

7
Expanding the donor pool for liver transplantation with marginal donors.扩大边缘供者肝移植的供者池。
Int J Surg. 2020 Oct;82S:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.024. Epub 2020 May 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验