Giri Suprabhat, Chandra Panigrahi Sarat, Mohapatra Vedavyas, Nath Preetam, Sahu Saroj K, Mallick Bipadabhanjan, Praharaj Dibya L, Anand Anil C
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Jan-Feb;15(1):102414. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102414. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
Vascular complications commonly cause graft loss and morbidity after liver transplantation (LT). Comparative data on the risk of vascular complications are limited. Hence, the present meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the difference in vascular complications between living-donor LT (LDLT) and deceased-donor LT (DDLT).
A literature search of three databases was conducted for studies comparing the incidence of vascular complications with LDLT and DDLT. The event rates and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model.
A total of 20 studies were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in the incidence of overall vascular complications (9.3%, 95% CI: 6.6-12.0 vs. 8.5%, 95% CI: 5.6-11.4) between LDLT and DDLT with OR 0.94 (95% CI: 0.73-1.21) (15 studies).There was a higher incidence of vascular complications with LDLT in older studies (published before 2013) but not in new studies. When comparing the individual complications, LDLT was associated with a higher incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) (3.8%, 95% CI: 2.4-5.2 vs. 1.6%, 95% CI: 1.1-2.2)with OR 2.20 (95% CI: 1.53-3.17) (14 studies)and a significantly lower incidence of intra-abdominal bleeding(4.8%, 95% CI: 3.3-6.2 vs. 7.9%, 95% CI: 5.0-10.7) with OR 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47-0.87) (11 studies). However, there was no difference in the incidence (2.1%, 95% CI: 0.5-3.8 vs. 1.0%, 95% CI: 0.1-1.9) of portal vein thrombosis between LDLT and DDLT with OR 1.85 (95% CI: 0.82-4.18) (6 studies).
Despite a comparable risk of vascular complications between LDLT and DDLT, LDLT was associated with a higher risk of HAT and a lower risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Further studies are required to analyze the effect of donor-recipient characteristics and surgical techniques on the risk of vascular complications.
血管并发症是肝移植(LT)后移植物丢失和发病的常见原因。关于血管并发症风险的比较数据有限。因此,本荟萃分析旨在分析活体肝移植(LDLT)和尸体肝移植(DDLT)之间血管并发症的差异。
对三个数据库进行文献检索,以寻找比较LDLT和DDLT血管并发症发生率的研究。使用随机效应模型计算事件发生率和95%置信区间(CI)的比值比(OR)。
最终分析共纳入20项研究。LDLT和DDLT之间总体血管并发症的发生率没有差异(9.3%,95%CI:6.6 - 12.0 vs. 8.5%,95%CI:5.6 - 11.4),OR为0.94(95%CI:0.73 - 1.21)(15项研究)。在较旧的研究(2013年之前发表)中,LDLT的血管并发症发生率较高,但在新研究中并非如此。在比较个体并发症时,LDLT与肝动脉血栓形成(HAT)的发生率较高相关(3.8%,95%CI:2.4 - 5.2 vs. 1.6%,95%CI:1.1 - 2.2),OR为2.20(95%CI:1.53 - 3.17)(14项研究),而腹腔内出血的发生率显著较低(4.8%,95%CI:3.3 - 6.2 vs. 7.9%,95%CI:5.0 - 10.7),OR为0.64(95%CI:0.47 - 0.87)(11项研究)。然而,LDLT和DDLT之间门静脉血栓形成的发生率没有差异(2.1%,95%CI:0.5 - 3.8 vs. 1.0%,95%CI:0.1 - 1.9),OR为1.85(95%CI:0.