Suppr超能文献

原发性进行性失语的症状导向分期

Symptom-led staging for primary progressive aphasia.

作者信息

Hardy Chris Jd, Taylor-Rubin Cathleen, Taylor Beatrice, Harding Emma, Gonzalez Aida Suarez, Jiang Jessica, Thompson Laura, Kingma Rachel, Chokesuwattanaskul Anthipa, Walker Ffion, Barker Suzie, Brotherhood Emilie, Waddington Claire, Wood Olivia, Zimmermann Nikki, Kupeli Nuriye, Yong Keir Xx, Camic Paul M, Stott Josh, Marshall Charles R, Oxtoby Neil P, Rohrer Jonathan D, Volkmer Anna, Crutch Sebastian J, Warren Jason D

机构信息

Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.

Uniting War Memorial Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Mar 17:2023.03.13.23286972. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.13.23286972.

Abstract

The primary progressive aphasias (PPA) present complex and diverse challenges of diagnosis, management and prognosis. A clinically-informed, syndromic staging system for PPA would take a substantial step toward meeting these challenges. This study addressed this need using detailed, multi-domain mixed-methods symptom surveys of people with lived experience in a large international PPA cohort. We administered structured online surveys to caregivers of patients with a canonical PPA syndromic variant (nonfluent/agrammatic (nvPPA), semantic (svPPA) or logopenic (lvPPA)). In an 'exploratory' survey, a putative list and ordering of verbal communication and nonverbal functioning (nonverbal thinking, conduct and wellbeing, physical) symptoms was administered to 118 caregiver members of the UK national PPA Support Group. Based on feedback, we expanded the symptom list and created six provisional clinical stages for each PPA subtype. In a 'consolidation' survey, these stages were presented to 110 caregiver members of UK and Australian PPA Support Groups, and refined based on quantitative and qualitative feedback. Symptoms were retained if rated as 'present' by a majority (at least 50%) of respondents representing that PPA syndrome, and assigned to a consolidated stage based on majority consensus; the confidence of assignment was estimated for each symptom as the proportion of respondents in agreement with the final staging for that symptom. Qualitative responses were analysed using framework analysis. For each PPA syndrome, six stages ranging from 1 ('Very mild') to 6 ('Profound') were identified; earliest stages were distinguished by syndromic hallmark symptoms of communication dysfunction, with increasing trans-syndromic convergence and dependency for basic activities of daily living at later stages. Spelling errors, hearing changes and nonverbal behavioural features were reported at early stages in all syndromes. As the illness evolved, swallowing and mobility problems were reported earlier in nfvPPA than other syndromes, while difficulty recognising familiar people and household items characterised svPPA and visuospatial symptoms were more prominent in lvPPA. Overall confidence of symptom staging was higher for svPPA than other syndromes. Across syndromes, functional milestones were identified as key deficits that predict the sequence of major daily life impacts and associated management needs. Qualitatively, we identified five major themes encompassing 15 subthemes capturing respondents' experiences of PPA and suggestions for staging implementation. This work introduces a prototypical, symptom-led staging scheme for canonical PPA syndromes: the PPA Progression Planning Aid (PPA ). Our findings have implications for diagnostic and care pathway guidelines, trial design and personalised prognosis and treatment for people living with these diseases.

摘要

原发性进行性失语(PPA)在诊断、管理和预后方面呈现出复杂多样的挑战。一个基于临床信息的PPA综合征分期系统将朝着应对这些挑战迈出重要一步。本研究通过对一个大型国际PPA队列中有实际生活经验的人群进行详细的多领域混合方法症状调查,满足了这一需求。我们对患有典型PPA综合征变体(非流利/语法缺失型(nvPPA)、语义型(svPPA)或语音流畅性缺失型(lvPPA))患者的照料者进行了结构化在线调查。在一项“探索性”调查中,向英国国家PPA支持小组的118名照料者成员发放了一份关于言语交流和非言语功能(非言语思维、行为和幸福感、身体方面)症状的假定列表及排序。根据反馈,我们扩展了症状列表,并为每种PPA亚型创建了六个临时临床阶段。在一项“巩固性”调查中,将这些阶段呈现给英国和澳大利亚PPA支持小组的110名照料者成员,并根据定量和定性反馈进行了完善。如果代表该PPA综合征的大多数(至少50%)受访者将症状评为“存在”,则保留该症状,并根据多数共识将其分配到一个合并阶段;将同意该症状最终分期的受访者比例作为该症状分期的置信度估计值。使用框架分析法对定性回答进行了分析。对于每种PPA综合征,确定了从1(“非常轻微”)到6(“严重”)的六个阶段;最早阶段的特征是沟通功能障碍的综合征标志性症状,后期阶段日常生活基本活动的跨综合征融合和依赖性增加。在所有综合征的早期阶段都报告了拼写错误、听力变化和非言语行为特征。随着病情发展,吞咽和行动问题在nfvPPA中比其他综合征更早出现,而识别熟悉的人和家庭物品困难是svPPA的特征,视觉空间症状在lvPPA中更为突出。svPPA症状分期的总体置信度高于其他综合征。在所有综合征中,功能里程碑被确定为预测主要日常生活影响顺序和相关管理需求的关键缺陷。在定性方面,我们确定了五个主要主题,包含15个子主题,涵盖了受访者对PPA的体验以及分期实施的建议。这项工作引入了一种针对典型PPA综合征的以症状为主导的原型分期方案:PPA进展规划辅助工具(PPA )。我们的研究结果对诊断和护理路径指南、试验设计以及这些疾病患者的个性化预后和治疗具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a94/10055437/e384784bf7da/nihpp-2023.03.13.23286972v1-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验