Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.
Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 25;12(11):e064576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064576.
We explored whether adapting neuropsychological tests for online administration during the COVID-19 pandemic was feasible for dementia research.
We used a longitudinal design for healthy controls, who completed face-to-face assessments 3-4 years before remote assessments. For patients, we used a cross-sectional design, contrasting a prospective remote cohort with a retrospective face-to-face cohort matched for age/education/severity.
Remote assessments were conducted using video-conferencing/online testing platforms, with participants using a personal computer/tablet at home. Face-to-face assessments were conducted in testing rooms at our research centre.
The remote cohort comprised 25 patients (n=8 Alzheimer's disease (AD); n=3 behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD); n=4 semantic dementia (SD); n=5 progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA); n=5 logopenic aphasia (LPA)). The face-to-face patient cohort comprised 64 patients (n=25 AD; n=12 bvFTD; n=9 SD; n=12 PNFA; n=6 LPA). Ten controls who previously participated in face-to-face research also took part remotely.
The outcome measures comprised the strength of evidence under a Bayesian framework for differences in performances between testing environments on general neuropsychological and neurolinguistic measures.
There was substantial evidence suggesting no difference across environments in both the healthy control and combined patient cohorts (including measures of working memory, single-word comprehension, arithmetic and naming; Bayes Factors (BF) >3), in the healthy control group alone (including measures of letter/category fluency, semantic knowledge and bisyllabic word repetition; all BF >3), and in the combined patient cohort alone (including measures of working memory, episodic memory, short-term verbal memory, visual perception, non-word reading, sentence comprehension and bisyllabic/trisyllabic word repetition; all BF >3). In the control cohort alone, there was substantial evidence in support of a difference across environments for tests of visual perception (BF=0.0404) and monosyllabic word repetition (BF=0.0487).
Our findings suggest that remote delivery of neuropsychological tests for dementia research is feasible.
我们探讨了在 COVID-19 大流行期间将神经心理学测试改编为在线管理是否适用于痴呆症研究。
我们对健康对照组使用纵向设计,这些对照组在远程评估前 3-4 年完成了面对面评估。对于患者,我们使用了横断面设计,对比了前瞻性远程队列和回顾性面对面队列,这些队列在年龄/教育/严重程度上相匹配。
远程评估使用视频会议/在线测试平台进行,参与者在家中使用个人计算机/平板电脑。面对面评估在我们研究中心的测试室进行。
远程队列包括 25 名患者(n=8 名阿尔茨海默病 (AD);n=3 名行为变异额颞叶痴呆 (bvFTD);n=4 名语义性痴呆 (SD);n=5 名进行性非流利性失语症 (PNFA);n=5 名失读症 (LPA))。面对面的患者队列包括 64 名患者(n=25 名 AD;n=12 名 bvFTD;n=9 名 SD;n=12 名 PNFA;n=6 名 LPA)。之前参加过面对面研究的 10 名对照组也远程参加了。
在健康对照组和合并患者队列中,有大量证据表明在一般神经心理学和神经语言学测量方面,两种测试环境之间的表现没有差异(贝叶斯因子 (BF) >3),在健康对照组中单独(包括工作记忆、单字理解、算术和命名;BF>3),在合并患者队列中单独(包括工作记忆、情节记忆、短期语言记忆、视觉感知、非词阅读、句子理解和双音节/三音节词重复;所有 BF >3)。在对照组中,有大量证据支持环境之间视觉感知测试(BF=0.0404)和单音节词重复测试(BF=0.0487)的差异。
我们的研究结果表明,远程提供痴呆症研究的神经心理学测试是可行的。