• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ability of Caprini and Padua Risk-Assessment Models to Predict Venous Thromboembolism in a Nationwide Study.在一项全国性研究中,Caprini和Padua风险评估模型预测静脉血栓栓塞的能力。
medRxiv. 2023 Mar 21:2023.03.20.23287506. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.20.23287506.
2
Ability of Caprini and Padua risk-assessment models to predict venous thromboembolism in a nationwide Veterans Affairs study.Caprini 和 Padua 风险评估模型在全国退伍军人事务研究中预测静脉血栓栓塞的能力。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101693. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101693. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
3
A composite risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism.静脉血栓栓塞的综合风险评估模型
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 Jan;13(1):101968. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101968. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
4
Caprini versus Padua venous thromboembolism risk assessment scores: A comparative study in hospitalized patients at a tertiary center.卡普里尼与帕多瓦静脉血栓栓塞风险评估评分:在一家三级中心住院患者中的比较研究。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Apr;45(4):362-368. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.4.20230954.
5
Comparison between Caprini and Padua risk assessment models for hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: a retrospective study.Caprini与Padua风险评估模型对住院有静脉血栓栓塞风险的内科患者的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;23(4):538-43. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw158. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
6
Risk Assessment in Chinese Hospitalized Patients Comparing the Padua and Caprini Scoring Algorithms.中国住院患者的风险评估:比较 Padua 和 Caprini 评分算法。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Dec;24(9_suppl):127S-135S. doi: 10.1177/1076029618797465. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
7
Prediction of bleeding in patients being considered for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.静脉血栓栓塞预防患者出血风险预测。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023 Nov;11(6):1182-1191.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.07.007. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
8
A Prospective Observational Cohort of Clinical Outcomes in Medical Inpatients prescribed Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis Using Different Clinical Risk Assessment Models(COMPT RAMs).采用不同临床风险评估模型(COMPT RAMs)对住院患者进行药物性血栓预防治疗的前瞻性观察性队列研究的临床结局。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 4;9(1):18366. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54842-3.
9
Assessment of the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Inpatients using the Padua Prediction Score and Caprini Risk Assessment Model.采用 Padua 预测评分和 Caprini 风险评估模型评估住院患者静脉血栓栓塞风险。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018 Nov 1;25(11):1091-1104. doi: 10.5551/jat.43653. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
10
Validation of risk assessment models predicting venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical inpatients: A cohort study.预测急性病内科住院患者静脉血栓栓塞的风险评估模型的验证:一项队列研究。
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jun;18(6):1398-1407. doi: 10.1111/jth.14796. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

在一项全国性研究中,Caprini和Padua风险评估模型预测静脉血栓栓塞的能力。

Ability of Caprini and Padua Risk-Assessment Models to Predict Venous Thromboembolism in a Nationwide Study.

作者信息

Hayssen Hilary, Sahoo Shalini, Nguyen Phuong, Mayorga-Carlin Minerva, Siddiqui Tariq, Englum Brian, Slejko Julia F, Mullins C Daniel, Yesha Yelena, Sorkin John D, Lal Brajesh K

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Mar 21:2023.03.20.23287506. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.20.23287506.

DOI:10.1101/2023.03.20.23287506
PMID:36993603
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10055569/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable complication of hospitalization. Risk-stratification is the cornerstone of prevention. The Caprini and Padua are the most commonly used risk-assessment models to quantify VTE risk. Both models perform well in select, high-risk cohorts. While VTE risk-stratification is recommended for all hospital admissions, few studies have evaluated the models in a large, unselected cohort of patients.

METHODS

We analyzed consecutive first hospital admissions of 1,252,460 unique surgical and non-surgical patients to 1,298 VA facilities nationwide between January 2016 and December 2021. Caprini and Padua scores were generated using the VA's national data repository. We first assessed the ability of the two RAMs to predict VTE within 90 days of admission. In secondary analyses, we evaluated prediction at 30 and 60 days, in surgical versus non-surgical patients, after excluding patients with upper extremity DVT, in patients hospitalized ≥72 hours, after including all-cause mortality in the composite outcome, and after accounting for prophylaxis in the predictive model. We used area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) as the metric of prediction.

RESULTS

A total of 330,388 (26.4%) surgical and 922,072 (73.6%) non-surgical consecutively hospitalized patients (total n=1,252,460) were analyzed. Caprini scores ranged from 0-28 (median, interquartile range: 4, 3-6); Padua scores ranged from 0-13 (1, 1-3). The RAMs showed good calibration and higher scores were associated with higher VTE rates. VTE developed in 35,557 patients (2.8%) within 90 days of admission. The ability of both models to predict 90-day VTE was low (AUCs: Caprini 0.56 [95% CI 0.56-0.56], Padua 0.59 [0.58-0.59]). Prediction remained low for surgical (Caprini 0.54 [0.53-0.54], Padua 0.56 [0.56-0.57]) and non-surgical patients (Caprini 0.59 [0.58-0.59], Padua 0.59 [0.59-0.60]). There was no clinically meaningful change in predictive performance in patients admitted for ≥72 hours, after excluding upper extremity DVT from the outcome, after including all-cause mortality in the outcome, or after accounting for ongoing VTE prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Caprini and Padua risk-assessment model scores have low ability to predict VTE events in a cohort of unselected consecutive hospitalizations. Improved VTE risk-assessment models must be developed before they can be applied to a general hospital population.

摘要

背景

静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是一种可预防的住院并发症。风险分层是预防的基石。Caprini和Padua是最常用的用于量化VTE风险的风险评估模型。这两种模型在特定的高危队列中表现良好。虽然建议对所有住院患者进行VTE风险分层,但很少有研究在未经选择的大型患者队列中评估这些模型。

方法

我们分析了2016年1月至2021年12月期间全国1298家退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗机构中1,252,460名独特的外科和非外科患者的连续首次住院情况。使用VA的国家数据存储库生成Caprini和Padua评分。我们首先评估这两种风险评估模型(RAMs)在入院后90天内预测VTE的能力。在二次分析中,我们评估了30天和60天时的预测情况,比较了外科与非外科患者,排除上肢深静脉血栓形成(DVT)患者后,住院≥72小时的患者,将全因死亡率纳入复合结局后,以及在预测模型中考虑预防措施后的预测情况。我们使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)作为预测指标。

结果

共分析了330,388名(26.4%)外科和922,072名(73.6%)非外科连续住院患者(总计n = 1,252,460)。Caprini评分范围为0 - 28(中位数,四分位间距:4,3 - 6);Padua评分范围为0 - 13(1,1 - 3)。这些RAMs显示出良好的校准,较高的评分与较高的VTE发生率相关。35,557名患者(2.8%)在入院后90天内发生VTE。两种模型预测90天VTE的能力较低(AUC:Caprini为0.56 [95%置信区间0.56 - 0.56],Padua为0.59 [0.58 - 0.59])。外科患者(Caprini为0.54 [0.53 - 0.54],Padua为0.56 [0.56 - 0.57])和非外科患者(Caprini为0.59 [0.58 - 0.59],Padua为0.59 [0.59 - 0.60])的预测能力仍然较低。在住院≥72小时的患者中,从结局中排除上肢DVT后,将全因死亡率纳入结局后,或在考虑正在进行的VTE预防措施后,预测性能没有临床上有意义的变化。

结论

Caprini和Padua风险评估模型评分在未经选择的连续住院患者队列中预测VTE事件的能力较低。在将改进的VTE风险评估模型应用于普通医院人群之前,必须先开发出来。