• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉血栓栓塞的综合风险评估模型

A composite risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism.

作者信息

Lin Mary Sixian, Hayssen Hilary, Mayorga-Carlin Minerva, Sahoo Shalini, Siddiqui Tariq, Jreij Georges, Englum Brian R, Nguyen Phuong, Yesha Yelena, Sorkin John David, Lal Brajesh K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Surgery, Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 Jan;13(1):101968. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101968. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101968
PMID:39305950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11764112/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of hospitalization-related morbidity and mortality. VTE prevention requires accurate risk stratification. Federal agencies mandated VTE risk assessment for all hospital admissions. We have shown that the widely used Caprini (30 risk factors) and Padua (11 risk factors) VTE risk-assessment models (RAMs) have limited predictive ability for VTE when used for all general hospital admissions. Here, we test whether combining the risk factors from all 23 available VTE RAMs improves VTE risk prediction.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the first hospitalizations of 1,282,014 surgical and non-surgical patients admitted to 1298 Veterans Affairs facilities nationwide between January 2016 and December 2021. We used logistic regression to predict VTE within 90 days of admission using risk factors from all 23 available VTE RAMs. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were used to quantify the predictive power of our models. The metrics were computed at two diagnostic thresholds that maximized (1) the value of sensitivity + specificity-1; and (2) PPV and were compared using McNemar's test. The Delong-Delong test was used to compare AUCs.

RESULTS

After excluding those with missing data, 1,185,633 patients (mean age, 66 years; 93% male; and 72% White) were analyzed, of whom 33,253 (2.8%) had a VTE (deep venous thrombosis [DVT], n = 19,218, 1.6%; pulmonary embolism [PE], n = 10,190, 0.9%; PE + DVT, n = 3845, 0.3%). Our composite RAM included 102 risk factors and improved prediction of VTE compared with the Caprini RAM risk factors (AUC composite model: 0.74; AUC Caprini risk-factor model: 0.63; P < .0001). When the sum of sensitivity and specificity-1 was maximized, the composite model demonstrated small improvements in sensitivity, specificity and PPV; NPV was high in both models. When PPV was maximized, the PPV of the composite model was improved but remained low. The nature of the relationship between NPV and PPV precluded any further gain in PPV by sacrificing NPV and sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a composite of 102 risk factors from all available VTE RAMs, we improved VTE prediction in a large, national cohort of >1 million general hospital admissions. However, neither model has a sensitivity or PPV that permits it to be a reliable predictor of VTE. We demonstrate the limits of currently available VTE risk prediction tools; no available RAM is ready for widespread use in the general hospital population.

摘要

目的

静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是住院相关发病和死亡的一个可预防原因。VTE预防需要准确的风险分层。联邦机构要求对所有住院患者进行VTE风险评估。我们已经表明,广泛使用的Caprini(30个风险因素)和Padua(11个风险因素)VTE风险评估模型(RAMs)在用于所有综合医院住院患者时,对VTE的预测能力有限。在此,我们测试将所有23种可用的VTE RAMs中的风险因素相结合是否能改善VTE风险预测。

方法

我们分析了2016年1月至2021年12月期间在全国1298家退伍军人事务机构住院的1,282,014例手术和非手术患者首次住院的数据。我们使用逻辑回归,利用所有23种可用的VTE RAMs中的风险因素预测入院后90天内的VTE。受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性以及阳性(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)用于量化我们模型的预测能力。这些指标在两个诊断阈值下计算,这两个阈值分别使(1)敏感性+特异性-1的值最大化;以及(2)PPV最大化,并使用McNemar检验进行比较。使用Delong-Delong检验比较AUCs。

结果

在排除数据缺失的患者后,对1,185,633例患者(平均年龄66岁;93%为男性;72%为白人)进行了分析,其中33,253例(2.8%)发生了VTE(深静脉血栓形成[DVT],n = 19,218,1.6%;肺栓塞[PE],n = 10,190,0.9%;PE + DVT,n = 3845,0.3%)。我们的综合RAM包括102个风险因素,与Caprini RAM风险因素相比,改善了VTE的预测(AUC综合模型:0.74;AUC Caprini风险因素模型:0.63;P <.0001)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc3/11764112/ed4069e95f91/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc3/11764112/949b7187db24/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc3/11764112/36fe052fc597/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc3/11764112/ff758d1e466a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc3/11764112/ed4069e95f91/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc3/11764112/949b7187db24/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc3/11764112/36fe052fc597/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc3/11764112/ff758d1e466a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc3/11764112/ed4069e95f91/figs1.jpg

相似文献

1
A composite risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism.静脉血栓栓塞的综合风险评估模型
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 Jan;13(1):101968. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101968. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Ability of Caprini and Padua risk-assessment models to predict venous thromboembolism in a nationwide Veterans Affairs study.Caprini 和 Padua 风险评估模型在全国退伍军人事务研究中预测静脉血栓栓塞的能力。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101693. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101693. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
3
Ability of Caprini and Padua Risk-Assessment Models to Predict Venous Thromboembolism in a Nationwide Study.在一项全国性研究中,Caprini和Padua风险评估模型预测静脉血栓栓塞的能力。
medRxiv. 2023 Mar 21:2023.03.20.23287506. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.20.23287506.
4
Comparison between Caprini and Padua risk assessment models for hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: a retrospective study.Caprini与Padua风险评估模型对住院有静脉血栓栓塞风险的内科患者的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;23(4):538-43. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw158. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
5
Caprini versus Padua venous thromboembolism risk assessment scores: A comparative study in hospitalized patients at a tertiary center.卡普里尼与帕多瓦静脉血栓栓塞风险评估评分:在一家三级中心住院患者中的比较研究。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Apr;45(4):362-368. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.4.20230954.
6
Comparison of 2013 and 2009 versions of Caprini risk assessment models for predicting VTE in Chinese cancer patients: a retrospective study.2013 版与 2009 版 Caprini 风险评估模型预测中国癌症患者 VTE 的比较:一项回顾性研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Aug;50(2):446-451. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02038-2.
7
Systematic review of venous thromboembolism risk categories derived from Caprini score.基于 Caprini 评分的静脉血栓栓塞风险分类的系统评价。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Nov;10(6):1401-1409.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
8
Derivation and External Validation of a Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Chinese Patients.中文译文:住院中国患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型的推导和外部验证。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296221151164. doi: 10.1177/10760296221151164.
9
Utilization of the Caprini score in conjunction with thrombodynamic testing reduces the number of unpredicted postoperative venous thromboembolism events in patients with colorectal cancer.Caprini 评分联合血栓动力检测可减少结直肠癌患者术后未预测到的静脉血栓栓塞事件的发生。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jan;8(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
Evaluating of Existing VTE Risk Scales in Glioma Patients.评估胶质瘤患者中现有的 VTE 风险量表。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241238210. doi: 10.1177/10760296241238210.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting venous thromboembolism complications following colorectal cancer surgery.用于预测结直肠癌手术后静脉血栓栓塞并发症的机器学习模型的开发与验证
Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. 2025 Sep 12;8(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s42492-025-00204-y.
2
Combined assessment of Caprini score, D-dimer, and thromboelastography for predicting deep venous thrombosis in lung cancer patients.联合评估Caprini评分、D-二聚体和血栓弹力图以预测肺癌患者的深静脉血栓形成
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):3299-3309. doi: 10.62347/TOVV5723. eCollection 2025.
3
Mechanical Thrombectomy for the Treatment of Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis using the ClotTriever System: A Single-Centre Experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Ability of Caprini and Padua risk-assessment models to predict venous thromboembolism in a nationwide Veterans Affairs study.Caprini 和 Padua 风险评估模型在全国退伍军人事务研究中预测静脉血栓栓塞的能力。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101693. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101693. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
2
Trends and Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism Among Hospitalized Medical Patients.住院内科患者静脉血栓栓塞症的趋势和风险因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2240373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40373.
3
Systematic review of venous thromboembolism risk categories derived from Caprini score.
使用ClotTriever系统进行机械血栓切除术治疗髂股深静脉血栓形成:单中心经验
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04112-9.
4
Nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding deep vein thrombosis and the nursing management.护士关于深静脉血栓形成及护理管理的知识、态度和实践。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 17;15(1):17174. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96551-0.
基于 Caprini 评分的静脉血栓栓塞风险分类的系统评价。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Nov;10(6):1401-1409.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
4
Venous thromboembolism risk stratification in trauma using the Caprini risk assessment model.创伤患者应用 Caprini 风险评估模型进行静脉血栓栓塞风险分层。
Thromb Res. 2021 Dec;208:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.10.016. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
5
Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review.住院成年患者静脉血栓栓塞症风险评估模型:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):e045672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045672.
6
Risk-assessment models for VTE and bleeding in hospitalized medical patients: an overview of systematic reviews.住院内科患者静脉血栓栓塞症和出血风险评估模型:系统评价概述。
Blood Adv. 2020 Oct 13;4(19):4929-4944. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002482.
7
Predicting the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: construction and verification of risk warning model.预测静脉血栓栓塞的发生:风险预警模型的构建与验证。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 May 27;20(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01519-9.
8
Machine learning to predict venous thrombosis in acutely ill medical patients.机器学习用于预测急性病内科患者的静脉血栓形成。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jan 21;4(2):230-237. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12292. eCollection 2020 Feb.
9
Application of the Caprini Risk Assessment Model for Evaluating Postoperative Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.Caprini风险评估模型在评估整形与重建手术患者术后深静脉血栓形成中的应用
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 May;65:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.082. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
10
Completion of the Updated Caprini Risk Assessment Model (2013 Version).更新后的卡普兰风险评估模型(2013 年版)的完成。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029619838052. doi: 10.1177/1076029619838052.