Zhai Miaobo, Du Xin, Liu Changmei, Xu Huipu
Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou, China.
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2021 Jun 30;2:703937. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2021.703937. eCollection 2021.
Cardiovascular disease threatens the health and quality of life of individuals, particularly those with type II diabetes. Recently, some studies have reported the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in reducing the rates of hospitalization or urgent visits, resulting in IV therapy for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
We did a comprehensive search in electronic databases from inception through July 2020 for randomized-controlled trials, using the keywords "sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor", "dapagliflozin", "heart failure", "cardiovascular outcomes", "major adverse cardiovascular events", "all-cause mortality", and "cardiovascular death". Random-effects summary odds ratios (OR) were constructed using M-L heterogeneity model.
Five trials with 5,252 patients were ultimately included. The incidence of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) (n=4, OR=0.74; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.88; I = 0%) and all-cause mortality (ACM, n=4, OR=0.76; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.94; I = 0%); was reduced by dapagliflozin, respectively, in all heart failure patients, without obvious heterogeneity. The incidence of cardiovascular death in dapagliflozin was lower than that in placebo without statistically significant (CVD, n=5, OR=0.84; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.03; I = 0%). In HFrEF subgroup, dapagliflozin was associated with a reduced incidence of hospitalization for heart failure (n=4, OR=0.74; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.91; I = 0%), cardiovascular death (n=4, OR=0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.91; I = 8%), and all-cause mortality (n=3, OR=0.70; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.99; I = 43%) without significant heterogeneity. In contrast, in the HFpEF subgroup, there was no difference in the incidence of cardiovascular death (n=2, OR=1.45; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.22; I = 0%) and all-cause mortality (n=2, OR=1.04; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.43; I = 0%) between dapagliflozin and placebo.
In our study, dapagliflozin performed a statistical reduction in the rate of heart failure hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF and diabetes. However, in the HFpEF subgroup, dapagliflozin did not show a significant cardiovascular protective effect.
心血管疾病威胁着个人的健康和生活质量,尤其是2型糖尿病患者。最近,一些研究报告了钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂在降低住院率或紧急就诊率方面的作用,从而为2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的心力衰竭进行静脉治疗。
我们从数据库建立至2020年7月在电子数据库中进行了全面检索,以查找随机对照试验,使用的关键词有“钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂”、“达格列净”、“心力衰竭”、“心血管结局”、“主要不良心血管事件”、“全因死亡率”和“心血管死亡”。使用M-L异质性模型构建随机效应汇总比值比(OR)。
最终纳入了5项试验,共5252例患者。在所有心力衰竭患者中,达格列净分别降低了心力衰竭住院率(HHF,n = 4,OR = 0.74;95% CI,0.61至0.88;I² = 0%)和全因死亡率(ACM,n = 4,OR = 0.76;95% CI,0.66至0.94;I² = 0%),且无明显异质性。达格列净组的心血管死亡率低于安慰剂组,但无统计学意义(CVD,n = 5,OR = 0.84;95% CI,0.69至1.03;I² = 0%)。在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)亚组中,达格列净与心力衰竭住院率降低(n = 4,OR = 0.74;95% CI,0.60至0.91;I² = 0%)、心血管死亡(n = 4,OR = 0.72;95% CI,0.58至0.91;I² = 8%)和全因死亡率降低(n = 3,OR = 0.70;95% CI,0.50至0.99;I² = 43%)相关,且无显著异质性。相比之下,在射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)亚组中,达格列净与安慰剂组在心血管死亡率(n = 2,OR = 1.45;95% CI,0.95至2.22;I² = 0%)和全因死亡率(n = 2,OR = 1.04;95% CI,0.76至1.43;I² = 0%)方面无差异。
在我们的研究中,达格列净在HFrEF合并糖尿病患者中使心力衰竭住院率、心血管死亡和全因死亡率有统计学意义的降低。然而,在HFpEF亚组中,达格列净未显示出显著的心血管保护作用。