Department of Psychology, Cathedral Court, The University of Sheffield, 1 Vicar Lane, Sheffield, S1 2LT, UK.
Mem Cognit. 2023 Aug;51(6):1287-1302. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01396-5. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
The accuracy of eyewitness interviews has legal and clinical implications within the criminal justice system. Leading verbal suggestions have been shown to give rise to false memories and inaccurate testimonies in children, but only a small body of research exists regarding non-verbal communication. The present study examined whether 5- to 8-year-olds in the UK could be misled about their memory of an event through exposure to leading gestural information, which suggested an incorrect response, using a variety of question and gesture types. Results showed that leading gestures significantly corrupted participants' memory compared to the control group (MD = 0.60, p < 0.001), with participants being misled by at least one question nearly three-quarters of the time. Questions about peripheral details, and gestures that were more visible and expressive, increased false memory further, with even subtle gestures demonstrating a strong misleading influence. We discuss the implications of these findings for the guidelines governing eyewitness interviews.
目击证人访谈的准确性在刑事司法系统中具有法律和临床意义。已有的研究表明,在儿童中,引导性的言语暗示会导致虚假记忆和不准确的证词,但关于非言语交流的研究还很少。本研究通过使用各种问题和手势类型,检验了英国 5 至 8 岁的儿童是否会因为接触到暗示错误答案的引导性手势信息而对事件的记忆产生误导。结果表明,与对照组相比,引导性手势显著破坏了参与者的记忆(MD=0.60,p<0.001),参与者几乎有四分之三的时间会被误导。关于次要细节的问题,以及更明显和更具表现力的手势,进一步增加了错误记忆,即使是微妙的手势也表现出强烈的误导影响。我们讨论了这些发现对指导目击证人访谈的准则的影响。