• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童易受暗示性的个体差异:最新综述

Individual Differences in Children's Suggestibility: An Updated Review.

作者信息

Klemfuss J Zoe, Olaguez Alma P

机构信息

Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Child Sex Abus. 2020 Feb-Mar;29(2):158-182. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2018.1508108. Epub 2018 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1080/10538712.2018.1508108
PMID:30142291
Abstract

The present review is intended as an overview of our current understanding of how children's individual characteristics, in terms of demographic, cognitive, and psycho-social variables, may influence their susceptibility to suggestion. The goals are to revisit conceptual models of the mechanisms of suggestibility, to provide an updated practical guide for practitioners, and to make recommendations for future research. Results suggest that children with intellectual impairment and those with nascent language skills may be particularly vulnerable to suggestion. Further, memory for separate events, theory of mind, executive function, temperament, and social competence may not be related to suggestibility, whereas additional work is needed to clarify the potential contributions of knowledge, stress, mental health, parental elaborative style, and adverse experiences/maltreatment to children's suggestibility.

摘要

本综述旨在概述我们目前对儿童的个体特征(从人口统计学、认知和心理社会变量方面来看)如何影响其受暗示性的理解。目标是重新审视暗示性机制的概念模型,为从业者提供一份更新的实用指南,并为未来研究提出建议。结果表明,智力障碍儿童和语言技能尚不完善的儿童可能特别容易受到暗示。此外,对单独事件的记忆、心理理论、执行功能、气质和社交能力可能与暗示性无关,而需要进一步开展研究以阐明知识、压力、心理健康、父母的阐述方式以及不良经历/虐待对儿童暗示性的潜在影响。

相似文献

1
Individual Differences in Children's Suggestibility: An Updated Review.儿童易受暗示性的个体差异:最新综述
J Child Sex Abus. 2020 Feb-Mar;29(2):158-182. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2018.1508108. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
2
Effects of Interviewer Support on Children's Memory and Suggestibility: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Experimental Research.访谈者支持对儿童记忆和暗示性的影响:实验研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019 Jan;20(1):22-39. doi: 10.1177/1524838016683457. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
3
Children's memory and suggestibility about a distressing event: the role of children's and parents' attachment.儿童对痛苦事件的记忆及受暗示性:儿童与父母依恋关系的作用
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Jul;123:90-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
4
Theory of mind, inhibitory control, and preschool-age children's suggestibility in different interviewing contexts.心理理论、抑制控制与不同访谈情境下学龄前儿童的易受暗示性
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Feb;93(2):120-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.09.005. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
5
The role of attachment and cognitive inhibition in children's memory and suggestibility for a stressful event.依恋和认知抑制在儿童对压力事件的记忆及易受暗示性方面的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Dec;83(4):262-90. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00149-2.
6
Effects of information type on children's interrogative suggestibility: is Theory-of-Mind involved?信息类型对儿童疑问暗示性的影响:心理理论是否起作用?
Cogn Process. 2009 Aug;10(3):199-207. doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0269-8. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
7
Memory and suggestibility in maltreated children: age, stress arousal, dissociation, and psychopathology.受虐儿童的记忆与暗示性:年龄、压力唤醒、解离及精神病理学
J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Nov;83(3):167-212. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00126-1.
8
Effects of Guiding Ground Rules and Individual Differences on the Accuracy of Children's Free Recall and Suggestibility.引导性基本规则和个体差异对儿童自由回忆和暗示准确性的影响。
J Child Sex Abus. 2023 Jul-Dec;32(7):829-844. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2023.2261925. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
9
Event memory and suggestibility in abused and neglected children: trauma-related psychopathology and cognitive functioning.受虐和被忽视儿童的事件记忆和暗示性:与创伤相关的精神病理学和认知功能。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Dec;110(4):520-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
10
Maltreated children's memory: accuracy, suggestibility, and psychopathology.受虐儿童的记忆:准确性、易受暗示性与精神病理学。
Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1275-94. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1275.

引用本文的文献

1
Conversational AI in Pediatric Mental Health: A Narrative Review.儿科心理健康中的对话式人工智能:叙事性综述
Children (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;12(3):359. doi: 10.3390/children12030359.
2
Effects of the narrative elaboration technique and open-ended rapport on accuracy of children's recall according to age.根据年龄,叙事详述技巧和开放式融洽关系对儿童回忆准确性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 9;15:1298759. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1298759. eCollection 2024.
3
Using rapport building to improve information yield when interviewing adolescents: A systematic review and call for research.
利用建立融洽关系来提高青少年访谈中的信息产出:系统评价及研究呼吁。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Aug;154:106898. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106898. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
Do cognitive abilities reduce eyewitness susceptibility to the misinformation effect? A systematic review.认知能力能否降低目击者对错误信息效应的易感性?一项系统综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2410-2436. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02512-5. Epub 2024 May 2.
5
Evaluating autobiographical skills and their relationship with suggestibility in children: development and validation of the Children Recalling Autobiographical Memory.评估儿童的自传体记忆能力及其与易受暗示性的关系:儿童自传体记忆回忆量表的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 23;15:1321305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1321305. eCollection 2024.
6
No gesture too small: An investigation into the ability of gestural information to mislead eyewitness accounts by 5- to 8-year-olds.小动作也能误导:手势信息对 5 至 8 岁儿童目击证词影响的研究。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Aug;51(6):1287-1302. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01396-5. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
7
Children's needs during disclosures of abuse.披露虐待行为期间儿童的需求。
SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(7):101. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00397-6. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
8
Differential effects of direct and cross examination on mock jurors' perceptions and memory in cases of child sexual abuse.直接询问和交叉询问对模拟陪审员在儿童性虐待案件中的认知和记忆的不同影响。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 May 19;27(5):778-796. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1742239. eCollection 2020.
9
Developmental differences in children's learning and use of forensic ground rules during an interview about an experienced event.儿童在经历事件访谈中学习和运用取证基本规则的发展差异。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Aug;55(8):1626-1639. doi: 10.1037/dev0000756. Epub 2019 Jun 13.