New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Nashville Fertility Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2023 Jun;28(3):168-172. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2023.2189501. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
Our objective was to analyse information and sentiments posted regarding the COVID-19 vaccine on fertility-related social media.
The first fifty accounts on Instagram and Twitter were identified with the terms: fertility doctor, fertility, OBGYN, infertility, TTC, IVF. Accounts were categorised as physician (PH), individual (ID), or fertility center/organisation (FCO). The vaccine was approved on 12/11/2020 and Instagram and Twitter posts dated 12/1/2020 - 2/28/2021 were reviewed. Posts were analysed for sentiment, mention of research studies (RS), national guidelines (NG), personal experience (PE), side effects (SE), reproductive related (RR) content and activity, including likes and comments.
A total of 276 accounts were included. Sentiments towards the vaccine were largely positive (PH 90.3%, ID 71.4%, FCO 70%), or neutral (PH 9.7%, ID 28.6%, FCO 30%). Instagram accounts showed an increase in activity on vaccine posts compared to baseline by likes (PH 4.86% v 3.76%, ID 7.5% v 6.37%, FCO 2.49% v 0.52%) and comments (PH 0.35% v 0.28%, ID 0.90% v 0.69%, FCO 0.10% v 0.02%*).
Most posts expressed positive sentiments towards the vaccine. Evaluating the sentiment of the COVID-19 vaccine as it relates to fertility on social media represents an opportunity for understanding both the patient's and health care professional's opinion on the subject. Given the potential devastating effects of misinformation on public health parameters, like vaccination, social media offers one avenue for healthcare professionals to engage online and work to make their presences more effective and influential.SHORT CONDENSATIONThis article analyses content and sentiments posted regarding the COVID-19 vaccine on fertility-related social media in order to offer a deeper understanding of available information and beliefs.
我们的目的是分析与生育相关的社交媒体上关于 COVID-19 疫苗的信息和情绪。
使用术语“生育医生”、“生育”、“妇产科医生”、“不孕不育”、“尝试怀孕”、“试管婴儿”,在 Instagram 和 Twitter 上分别确定前五十个账户。将账户分为医生(PH)、个人(ID)或生育中心/组织(FCO)。疫苗于 2020 年 12 月 11 日获得批准,审查了 2020 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 2 月 28 日的 Instagram 和 Twitter 帖子。对帖子的情绪、对研究的提及(RS)、国家指南(NG)、个人经历(PE)、副作用(SE)、生殖相关(RR)内容和活动(包括点赞和评论)进行了分析。
共纳入 276 个账户。对疫苗的态度主要是积极的(PH90.3%、ID71.4%、FCO70%)或中立的(PH9.7%、ID28.6%、FCO30%)。与基线相比,Instagram 账户上的疫苗帖子点赞量(PH4.86%比 3.76%、ID7.5%比 6.37%、FCO2.49%比 0.52%*)和评论量(PH0.35%比 0.28%、ID0.90%比 0.69%、FCO0.10%比 0.02%)都有所增加。
大多数帖子对疫苗表示积极的态度。评估 COVID-19 疫苗在社交媒体上对生育的影响,代表了了解患者和医疗保健专业人员对该主题的看法的机会。鉴于错误信息对公共卫生参数(如疫苗接种)的潜在破坏性影响,社交媒体为医疗保健专业人员提供了一个在线参与的途径,并努力使他们的存在更有效和更有影响力。
本文分析了与生育相关的社交媒体上关于 COVID-19 疫苗的内容和情绪,以提供对现有信息和信念的更深入了解。