社交媒体上与 COVID-19 疫苗副作用相关内容的回顾性分析。
A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects.
机构信息
Department for Oral and Craniomaxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.
Department for Virology, University Hospital Cologne and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.
出版信息
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 3;40(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.052. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
OBJECTIVES
With an uprising influence of social media platforms like Twitter and Instagram a multitude of worldwide accessible information is available. Since the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic the exchange of medical information about several topics related to this infectious disease and its vaccination has increased rapidly. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the content associated with COVID-19 vaccination and its side effects and evaluate its educational quality.
METHODS
We conducted this retrospective study to investigate 600 Twitter and Instagram posts by #covidvaccinesideeffects due to number of 'likes', comments, type of post, language, its purpose and source. In addition, posts were evaluated due to educational quality by three examiners of different educational levels.
RESULTS
The majority of posts showed 0 to 50 "likes" and 0 to 5 comments in English language. A comparison between Twitter and Instagram by the influence of application showed significant differences in number of posts and "likes" or comments (p < 0.05). The major post type were texts for Twitter (251; 83.7%) and videos for Instagram (104; 34.7%). While a majority of posts by #covidvaccinesideeffects report about the occurrence of side effects, the majority of them were mild and general COVID-19 vaccination feedback during the first 4 months was positive. But, only 3 to 7% were rated by "excellent" educational and validatable content. Interrater reliability between all three examiners presented a high concordance with 89% (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
This study presents an analysis of quantity and quality of social media content according to COVID-19 vaccinations and its side effects. It supports the deduction that most of the content on Twitter and Instagram is shared by patients and unclear sources and thus is limited informative. Nevertheless, influence of social media on medical information especially during COVID-19 pandemic is increasing and practitioners have to face its effect on their patients.
目的
随着 Twitter 和 Instagram 等社交媒体平台影响力的上升，大量全球可访问的信息得以传播。自 COVID-19 大流行开始以来，与这种传染病及其疫苗接种相关的多个主题的医学信息交流迅速增加。本研究的目的是评估与 COVID-19 疫苗接种及其副作用相关的内容，并评估其教育质量。
方法
我们进行了这项回顾性研究，通过调查 #covidvaccinesideeffects 由于“点赞”、评论、帖子类型、语言、目的和来源的数量，共调查了 600 个 Twitter 和 Instagram 帖子。此外，由三位不同教育水平的考官根据教育质量对帖子进行评估。
结果
大多数帖子的“点赞”数量为 0 到 50，评论数量为 0 到 5。通过应用程序的影响力对 Twitter 和 Instagram 进行比较，帖子数量和“点赞”或评论之间存在显著差异（p<0.05）。Twitter 的主要帖子类型是文本（251 个，83.7%），Instagram 的主要帖子类型是视频（104 个，34.7%）。虽然大多数关于 #covidvaccinesideeffects 的帖子报告了副作用的发生，但大多数副作用是轻微的，在头 4 个月，普通 COVID-19 疫苗接种反馈是积极的。但是，只有 3%到 7%的帖子被评为具有“优秀”教育和可验证内容。所有三位考官之间的组内一致性非常高，达到 89%（p=0.001）。
结论
本研究根据 COVID-19 疫苗接种及其副作用分析了社交媒体内容的数量和质量。它支持这样一种推断，即 Twitter 和 Instagram 上的大部分内容都是由患者和来源不明的人分享的，因此信息量有限。然而，社交媒体对医学信息的影响，尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行期间，正在增加，从业者必须面对其对患者的影响。
Zotero 插件