Wilson Mackenzie, van Allen Zachary M, Grimshaw Jeremy M, Brehaut Jamie C, Durand Audrey, Lalonde Jean-François, Manuel Douglas G, Michie Susan, West Robert, Presseau Justin
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Nov;28(4):893-913. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12660. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
The route into the body for many pathogens is through the eyes, nose and mouth (i.e., the 'T-zone') via inhalation or fomite-based transfer during face touching. It is important to understand factors that are associated with touching the T-zone to inform preventive strategies.
To identify theory-informed predictors of intention to reduce facial 'T-zone' touching and self-reported 'T-zone' touching.
We conducted a nationally representative prospective questionnaire study of Canadians. Respondents were randomized to answer questions about touching their eyes, nose, or mouth with a questionnaire assessing 11 factors from an augmented Health Action Process Approach at baseline: intention, outcome expectancies, risk perception, individual severity, self-efficacy, action planning, coping planning, social support, automaticity, goal facilitation and stability of context. At 2-week follow-up, we assessed HAPA-based indicators of self-regulatory activities (awareness of standards, effort, self-monitoring) and self-reported behaviour (primary dependent variable).
Of 656 Canadian adults recruited, 569 responded to follow-up (87% response rate). Across all areas of the 'T-zone', outcome expectancy was the strongest predictor of intention to reduce facial 'T-zone' touching, while self-efficacy was a significant predictor for only the eyes and mouth. Automaticity was the strongest predictor of behaviour at the 2-week follow-up. No sociodemographic or psychological factors predicted behaviour, with the exception of self-efficacy, which negatively predicted eye touching.
Findings suggest that focusing on reflective processes may increase intention to reduce 'T-zone' touching, while reducing actual 'T-zone' touching may require strategies that address the automatic nature of this behaviour.
许多病原体进入人体的途径是通过眼睛、鼻子和嘴巴(即“T区”),在触摸面部时通过吸入或基于污染物的传播。了解与触摸T区相关的因素对于制定预防策略很重要。
确定基于理论的预测因素,以预测减少面部“T区”触摸的意图和自我报告的“T区”触摸行为。
我们对加拿大人进行了一项具有全国代表性的前瞻性问卷调查研究。在基线时,受访者被随机分配回答一份关于触摸眼睛、鼻子或嘴巴的问卷,该问卷从增强的健康行动过程方法中评估11个因素:意图、结果预期、风险感知、个体严重性、自我效能感、行动计划、应对计划、社会支持、自动性、目标促进和情境稳定性。在2周的随访中,我们评估了基于健康行动过程方法的自我调节活动指标(对标准的认识、努力程度、自我监测)和自我报告的行为(主要因变量)。
在招募的656名加拿大成年人中,569人回复了随访(回复率为87%)。在“T区”的所有部位中,结果预期是减少面部“T区”触摸意图的最强预测因素,而自我效能感仅是眼睛和嘴巴触摸意图的显著预测因素。在2周的随访中,自动性是行为的最强预测因素。除自我效能感对触摸眼睛有负向预测作用外,没有社会人口统计学或心理因素能预测行为。
研究结果表明,关注反思过程可能会增加减少“T区”触摸的意图,而减少实际的“T区”触摸可能需要采取策略来应对这种行为的自动性。