• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于数据的人类动作表示研究。

A data-driven investigation of human action representations.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.

Department of Computer Science, Western University, London, Canada.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 30;13(1):5171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32192-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-32192-5
PMID:36997625
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10063663/
Abstract

Understanding actions performed by others requires us to integrate different types of information about people, scenes, objects, and their interactions. What organizing dimensions does the mind use to make sense of this complex action space? To address this question, we collected intuitive similarity judgments across two large-scale sets of naturalistic videos depicting everyday actions. We used cross-validated sparse non-negative matrix factorization to identify the structure underlying action similarity judgments. A low-dimensional representation, consisting of nine to ten dimensions, was sufficient to accurately reconstruct human similarity judgments. The dimensions were robust to stimulus set perturbations and reproducible in a separate odd-one-out experiment. Human labels mapped these dimensions onto semantic axes relating to food, work, and home life; social axes relating to people and emotions; and one visual axis related to scene setting. While highly interpretable, these dimensions did not share a clear one-to-one correspondence with prior hypotheses of action-relevant dimensions. Together, our results reveal a low-dimensional set of robust and interpretable dimensions that organize intuitive action similarity judgments and highlight the importance of data-driven investigations of behavioral representations.

摘要

理解他人的行为需要我们整合关于人、场景、物体及其相互作用的不同类型的信息。思维使用什么组织维度来理解这个复杂的动作空间?为了解决这个问题,我们在两个大规模的自然主义视频数据集之间收集了直观的相似性判断。我们使用交叉验证稀疏非负矩阵分解来识别动作相似性判断的基础结构。一个由九到十个维度组成的低维表示足以准确地重建人类的相似性判断。这些维度对刺激集的扰动具有鲁棒性,并且在单独的异常值实验中具有可重现性。人类标签将这些维度映射到与食物、工作和家庭生活相关的语义轴上;与人及情绪相关的社会轴;以及一个与场景设置相关的视觉轴。虽然这些维度具有高度的可解释性,但它们与之前关于与动作相关维度的假设没有明确的一一对应关系。总之,我们的研究结果揭示了一组低维的、稳健的、可解释的维度,这些维度可以组织直观的动作相似性判断,并强调了对行为表示进行数据驱动研究的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd6/10063663/d38f60a371bc/41598_2023_32192_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd6/10063663/810a012e9543/41598_2023_32192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd6/10063663/082d7f0c01e7/41598_2023_32192_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd6/10063663/9e2a9fa39125/41598_2023_32192_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd6/10063663/b56f61b2b98b/41598_2023_32192_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd6/10063663/d38f60a371bc/41598_2023_32192_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd6/10063663/810a012e9543/41598_2023_32192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd6/10063663/082d7f0c01e7/41598_2023_32192_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd6/10063663/9e2a9fa39125/41598_2023_32192_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd6/10063663/b56f61b2b98b/41598_2023_32192_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd6/10063663/d38f60a371bc/41598_2023_32192_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A data-driven investigation of human action representations.基于数据的人类动作表示研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 30;13(1):5171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32192-5.
2
Perceived similarity as a window into representations of integrated sentence meaning.感知相似性作为理解整合句子意义的窗口。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):2675-2691. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02129-x. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
3
Visual features as stepping stones toward semantics: Explaining object similarity in IT and perception with non-negative least squares.作为通向语义学垫脚石的视觉特征:用非负最小二乘法解释信息技术与感知中的物体相似性。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Mar;83:201-226. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
4
Dimensions underlying human understanding of the reachable world.人类对可及世界的理解的维度。
Cognition. 2023 May;234:105368. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105368. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
5
Shared representations of human actions across vision and language.人类动作在视觉和语言上的共享表示。
Neuropsychologia. 2024 Sep 9;202:108962. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108962. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
6
Six dimensions describe action understanding: The ACT-FASTaxonomy.六个维度描述了动作理解:ACT-FAST 分类法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Apr;122(4):577-605. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000286. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
Social-affective features drive human representations of observed actions.社会情感特征驱动人类对观察到的动作的表现。
Elife. 2022 May 24;11:e75027. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75027.
8
Similarity as a Window on the Dimensions of Object Representation.相似性作为物体表征维度的一扇窗口。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Feb;25(2):94-96. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.12.003. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
Revealing the multidimensional mental representations of natural objects underlying human similarity judgements.揭示人类相似性判断所基于的自然物体的多维心理表象。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1173-1185. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00951-3. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
10
The Neural Representations of Emotional Experiences Are More Similar Than Those of Neutral Experiences.情绪体验的神经表象比中性体验的更相似。
J Neurosci. 2022 Mar 30;42(13):2772-2785. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1490-21.2022. Epub 2022 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Behaviorally-relevant features of observed actions dominate cortical representational geometry in natural vision.在自然视觉中,观察到的动作的行为相关特征主导着皮层表征几何结构。
Res Sq. 2024 Dec 3:rs.3.rs-5478816. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5478816/v1.
2
Behaviorally-relevant features of observed actions dominate cortical representational geometry in natural vision.在自然视觉中,观察到的动作的行为相关特征主导着皮层表征几何结构。
bioRxiv. 2024 Nov 26:2024.11.26.624178. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.26.624178.
3
Perceptual discrimination of action formidableness and friendliness and the impact of autistic traits.

本文引用的文献

1
Dimensions underlying human understanding of the reachable world.人类对可及世界的理解的维度。
Cognition. 2023 May;234:105368. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105368. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
2
A highly selective response to food in human visual cortex revealed by hypothesis-free voxel decomposition.基于无假设体素分解的人类视觉皮层对食物的高度选择性反应。
Curr Biol. 2022 Oct 10;32(19):4159-4171.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.009. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
3
Social-affective features drive human representations of observed actions.社会情感特征驱动人类对观察到的动作的表现。
动作可畏性和友好性的知觉辨别与自闭症特质的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):25554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76488-6.
4
Overlapping representations of observed actions and action-related features.观察到的动作和与动作相关的特征的重叠表示。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Feb 15;45(3):e26605. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26605.
Elife. 2022 May 24;11:e75027. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75027.
4
Two 'what' pathways for action and object recognition.两种“什么”通路用于动作和物体识别。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;26(2):103-116. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
5
Behavioral and neural representations en route to intuitive action understanding.行为和神经表现与直观动作理解。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Dec 10;163:108048. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108048. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
6
Six dimensions describe action understanding: The ACT-FASTaxonomy.六个维度描述了动作理解:ACT-FAST 分类法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Apr;122(4):577-605. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000286. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
People accurately predict the transition probabilities between actions.人们准确地预测了行动之间的转移概率。
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 26;7(9). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4995. Print 2021 Feb.
8
Revealing the multidimensional mental representations of natural objects underlying human similarity judgements.揭示人类相似性判断所基于的自然物体的多维心理表象。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1173-1185. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00951-3. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
9
Sociality and interaction envelope organize visual action representations.社会性和交互作用包络组织视觉动作表征。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 12;11(1):3002. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16846-w.
10
People represent mental states in terms of rationality, social impact, and valence: Validating the 3d Mind Model.人们根据理性、社会影响和效价来表示心理状态:验证 3d 思维模型。
Cortex. 2020 Apr;125:44-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Jan 3.