Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, 170, Jomaru-Ro, Bucheon-Si, Gyeonggi-do, 14584, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 May;46(5):664-669. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03416-y. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
To evaluate the efficacy and technical feasibility of plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices via pathways different from the typical gastrorenal shunt.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 130 patients who underwent plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices between 2013 and 2022. Eight patients underwent plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration via different pathways. We evaluated the types of portosystemic shunts in these patients, the procedure technical and clinical success rates, and clinical outcomes.
In these eight patients (6 males, 2 females; mean age = 60 ± 6 years), the most common type of portosystemic shunt was a gastrocaval shunt (n = 7). Five patients had a gastrocaval shunt only; two had coexisting gastrocaval and gastrorenal shunts. One patient had a pericardiacophrenic shunt without a gastrorenal or gastrocaval shunt. The mean procedure time was 55 min. For patients with a gastrocaval shunt alone (n = 5), the mean procedure time was 40.8 min. The technical and clinical success rates were 100%. No major complication related to the procedure occurred. An initial follow-up computed tomography was performed within 2-3 weeks in all patients and revealed complete thrombosis of the gastric varices. Subsequent follow-up computed tomography (interval: 2-6 months) was performed in seven patients and showed complete disappearance of the gastric varices in all patients. During the follow-up period (range: 42 days-6.25 years), no patients experienced rebleeding or recurrence of gastric varices.
Plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration via alternative portosystemic shunts is effective and technically feasible in the treatment of gastric varices.
评估通过不同于典型胃肾分流的途径进行辅助塞子逆行经静脉闭塞治疗胃静脉曲张的疗效和技术可行性。
我们回顾性分析了 2013 年至 2022 年间 130 例接受辅助塞子逆行经静脉闭塞治疗胃静脉曲张的患者的病历。8 例患者通过不同途径进行辅助塞子逆行经静脉闭塞。我们评估了这些患者的门体分流类型、手术技术和临床成功率以及临床结果。
这 8 例患者(6 例男性,2 例女性;平均年龄 60±6 岁)中最常见的门体分流类型是胃腔分流(n=7)。5 例患者仅存在胃腔分流;2 例患者并存胃腔和胃肾分流。1 例患者存在无心包胸膜分流而无胃肾或胃腔分流。平均手术时间为 55 分钟。对于仅存在胃腔分流的患者(n=5),平均手术时间为 40.8 分钟。技术和临床成功率均为 100%。无与手术相关的重大并发症发生。所有患者均在术后 2-3 周内行初始随访 CT,结果显示胃静脉曲张完全血栓形成。随后对 7 例患者进行了后续 CT 随访(间隔:2-6 个月),所有患者的胃静脉曲张均完全消失。在随访期间(42 天-6.25 年),无患者出现再出血或胃静脉曲张复发。
通过替代门体分流途径进行辅助塞子逆行经静脉闭塞治疗胃静脉曲张是有效且技术可行的。