Suppr超能文献

手术与保守治疗单侧下颈椎未脱位小关节骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Surgical versus conservative treatment of unilateral subaxial non-subluxed facet fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;199:106280. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106280. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Unilateral subaxial non-subluxed facet fractures (USNSFF) are a pathology seen in traumatic events such as motor vehicle accidents. Management involves either rigid collar bracing or surgical intervention. There currently is no consensus on the treatment of these injuries; this review aims to examine the extant data for recommendations as to which treatment is more effective.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane trial register were all searched on January 16, 2020, comparing outcomes for surgical and conservative therapy for USNSFF. The meta-analysis examined rates of treatment failure (need for subsequent operative management) in conservative versus surgical management. The meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, with visualization in forest and L'Abbé plots.

RESULTS

We identified six retrospective studies describing 270 patients, with three studies describing 137 patients used in the meta-analysis. Overall, a surgical success rate of 97.7 % and a non-operative success rate of 79.7 % was observed. A random effects model risk ratio of 1.66 (95 % CI: 0.61-4.52) was obtained, suggesting efficacy of surgical management over conservative management.

CONCLUSION

The need for surgical intervention subsequent to initial management in the treatment of USNSFF was found to be lower in surgical treatment in contrast to conservative management. However, the studies that were included in the meta-analysis had patient cohorts with much higher rates of neurological deficit and ligamentous injury on presentation, indicating that these may be prognostic indicators of conservative management failure. Furthermore, those that did fail conservative management did not develop severely debilitating conditions. Accordingly, conservative treatment is generally sufficient as a first step in a majority of cases of USNSFF lacking neurological deficit or ligamentous involvement.

摘要

背景与目的

单侧下颈椎非半脱位关节突骨折(USNSFF)是一种创伤性疾病,多见于交通事故等。其治疗方法包括硬领固定或手术干预。目前对于这种损伤的治疗方法尚无共识,本综述旨在检查现有的数据,以提供更有效的治疗建议。

方法

2020 年 1 月 16 日,我们通过 MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Cochrane 试验注册中心检索了比较 USNSFF 手术和保守治疗结果的文献。荟萃分析检查了保守治疗与手术治疗的治疗失败率(需要后续手术治疗)。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型,以森林图和 L'Abbé 图进行可视化。

结果

我们共确定了 6 项回顾性研究,共描述了 270 例患者,其中 3 项研究共描述了 137 例患者纳入荟萃分析。总体上,手术成功率为 97.7%,非手术成功率为 79.7%。随机效应模型的风险比为 1.66(95%CI:0.61-4.52),表明手术治疗比保守治疗更有效。

结论

与保守治疗相比,在 USNSFF 的初始治疗后,手术治疗需要再次手术干预的情况较少。然而,纳入荟萃分析的研究中,患者队列在就诊时神经功能缺损和韧带损伤的发生率更高,这表明这些可能是保守治疗失败的预后指标。此外,那些保守治疗失败的患者并没有发展出严重致残的情况。因此,在大多数无神经功能缺损或韧带受累的 USNSFF 病例中,保守治疗通常是首选的第一步。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验