Shibutani Yuma, Suzuki Shinya, Sagara Atsunobu, Enokida Tomohiro, Okano Susumu, Fujisawa Takao, Sato Fumiaki, Yumoto Tetsuro, Sano Motohiko, Kawasaki Toshikatsu, Tahara Makoto
Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Hoshi University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan.
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 14;13:1154771. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1154771. eCollection 2023.
Proteinuria is the most frequent adverse event of lenvatinib use. However, the association between lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal dysfunction remains unclear.
We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with thyroid cancer without proteinuria treated with lenvatinib as a first-line systemic therapy at the initiation of treatment to assess the association between lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal function and the risk factors for the development of ≥3+ proteinuria on a dipstick test. Proteinuria was assessed by the dipstick test throughout the treatment in all cases.
Of the 76 patients, 39 developed ≤2+ proteinuria (low proteinuria group) and 37 developed ≥3+ proteinuria (high proteinuria group). There was no significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between high and low proteinuria groups at each time point, but there was a trend toward a significant decrease in eGFR of -9.3 ml/min/1.73 m in all patients after 2 years of treatment. The percentage of change in eGFR (ΔeGFR) significantly decreased in the high proteinuria group compared to that in the low proteinuria group (ΔeGFR: -6.8% vs. -17.2%, p=0.04). However, there was no significant difference in development of severe renal dysfunction with eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m between the two groups. Moreover, no patients permanently discontinued treatment because of renal dysfunction in both groups. Furthermore, renal function after completion of lenvatinib was reversible.
There was no association between the degree of lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal function. Therefore, treatment should be continued with attention to renal function, regardless of the degree of proteinuria.
蛋白尿是使用乐伐替尼最常见的不良事件。然而,乐伐替尼诱导的蛋白尿与肾功能不全之间的关联仍不清楚。
我们回顾性分析了在治疗开始时接受乐伐替尼作为一线全身治疗的无蛋白尿甲状腺癌患者的病历,以评估乐伐替尼诱导的蛋白尿与肾功能之间的关联以及尿试纸检测中出现≥3+蛋白尿的危险因素。所有病例在整个治疗过程中均通过尿试纸检测评估蛋白尿情况。
76例患者中,39例出现≤2+蛋白尿(低蛋白尿组),37例出现≥3+蛋白尿(高蛋白尿组)。高蛋白尿组和低蛋白尿组在各时间点的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)无显著差异,但在治疗2年后,所有患者的eGFR有显著下降趋势,下降了-9.3 ml/min/1.73 m²。与低蛋白尿组相比,高蛋白尿组的eGFR变化百分比(ΔeGFR)显著降低(ΔeGFR:-6.8% vs. -17.2%,p = 0.04)。然而,两组中eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73 m²的严重肾功能不全发生率无显著差异。此外,两组均无患者因肾功能不全而永久停药。而且,乐伐替尼治疗结束后的肾功能是可逆的。
乐伐替尼诱导的蛋白尿程度与肾功能之间无关联。因此,无论蛋白尿程度如何,均应在关注肾功能的情况下继续治疗。