• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习模型对肺血栓栓塞症患者院内不良临床结局的预测

Prediction of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, machine learning based models.

作者信息

Jenab Yaser, Hosseini Kaveh, Esmaeili Zahra, Tofighi Saeed, Ariannejad Hamid, Sotoudeh Houman

机构信息

Tehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 14;10:1087702. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1087702. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1087702
PMID:36998977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10043172/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular events. The conventional modeling methods and severity risk scores lack multiple laboratories, paraclinical and imaging data. Data science and machine learning (ML) based prediction models may help better predict outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective registry-based design, all consecutive hospitalized patients diagnosed with pulmonary thromboembolism (based on pulmonary CT angiography) from 2011 to 2019 were recruited. ML based algorithms [Gradient Boosting (GB) and Deep Learning (DL)] were applied and compared with logistic regression (LR) to predict hemodynamic instability and/or all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total number of 1,017 patients were finally enrolled in the study, including 465 women and 552 men. Overall incidence of study main endpoint was 9.6%, (7.2% in men and 12.4% in women; -value = 0.05). The overall performance of the GB model is better than the other two models (AUC: 0.94 for GB vs. 0.88 and 0.90 for DL and LR models respectively). Based on GB model, lower O saturation and right ventricle dilation and dysfunction were among the strongest adverse event predictors.

CONCLUSION

ML-based models have notable prediction ability in PE patients. These algorithms may help physicians to detect high-risk patients earlier and take appropriate preventive measures.

摘要

背景

肺血栓栓塞症(PE)是心血管事件的第三大主要病因。传统的建模方法和严重程度风险评分缺乏多个实验室、辅助检查和影像数据。基于数据科学和机器学习(ML)的预测模型可能有助于更好地预测结果。

材料与方法

在这项基于回顾性登记的设计中,纳入了2011年至2019年期间所有连续住院的被诊断为肺血栓栓塞症(基于肺部CT血管造影)的患者。应用基于ML的算法[梯度提升(GB)和深度学习(DL)],并与逻辑回归(LR)进行比较,以预测血流动力学不稳定和/或全因死亡率。

结果

共有1017例患者最终纳入研究,其中女性465例,男性552例。研究主要终点的总体发生率为9.6%,(男性为7.2%,女性为12.4%;P值=0.05)。GB模型的总体性能优于其他两个模型(AUC:GB为0.94,而DL和LR模型分别为0.88和0.90)。基于GB模型,较低的氧饱和度以及右心室扩张和功能障碍是最强的不良事件预测因素。

结论

基于ML的模型在PE患者中具有显著的预测能力。这些算法可能有助于医生更早地检测出高危患者并采取适当的预防措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e476/10043172/8e30a0819a8e/fcvm-10-1087702-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e476/10043172/a5804fc166b6/fcvm-10-1087702-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e476/10043172/eda7965985a5/fcvm-10-1087702-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e476/10043172/616aaf27ac60/fcvm-10-1087702-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e476/10043172/8e30a0819a8e/fcvm-10-1087702-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e476/10043172/a5804fc166b6/fcvm-10-1087702-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e476/10043172/eda7965985a5/fcvm-10-1087702-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e476/10043172/616aaf27ac60/fcvm-10-1087702-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e476/10043172/8e30a0819a8e/fcvm-10-1087702-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, machine learning based models.基于机器学习模型对肺血栓栓塞症患者院内不良临床结局的预测
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 14;10:1087702. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1087702. eCollection 2023.
2
Development and validation of machine learning prediction model based on computed tomography angiography-derived hemodynamics for rupture status of intracranial aneurysms: a Chinese multicenter study.基于 CT 血管造影血流动力学的颅内动脉瘤破裂状态的机器学习预测模型的建立与验证:一项中国多中心研究。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):5170-5182. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06886-7. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
3
Construction of a Risk Prediction Model for Hospital-Acquired Pulmonary Embolism in Hospitalized Patients.构建住院患者医院获得性肺栓塞风险预测模型。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jan-Dec;27:10760296211040868. doi: 10.1177/10760296211040868.
4
Development and internal validation of a machine-learning-developed model for predicting 1-year mortality after fragility hip fracture.开发和内部验证一种机器学习开发的模型,用于预测脆性髋部骨折后 1 年的死亡率。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 24;22(1):451. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03152-x.
5
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
6
Electronic Medical Record-Based Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Risk of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events After Invasive Coronary Treatment: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation.基于电子病历的机器学习方法预测侵入性冠状动脉治疗后30天不良心脏事件风险:机器学习模型的开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 May 11;10(5):e26801. doi: 10.2196/26801.
7
Machine-learning prediction of unplanned 30-day rehospitalization using the French hospital medico-administrative database.使用法国医院医疗管理数据库进行计划外30天再住院的机器学习预测。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e22361. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022361.
8
Explainable Machine Learning Techniques To Predict Amiodarone-Induced Thyroid Dysfunction Risk: Multicenter, Retrospective Study With External Validation.可解释机器学习技术预测胺碘酮诱导甲状腺功能障碍风险:多中心回顾性研究及外部验证。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 7;25:e43734. doi: 10.2196/43734.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Use of Multiprognostic Index Domain Scores, Clinical Data, and Machine Learning to Improve 12-Month Mortality Risk Prediction in Older Hospitalized Patients: Prospective Cohort Study.使用多预后指标领域评分、临床数据和机器学习提高老年住院患者 12 个月死亡率风险预测:前瞻性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 21;23(6):e26139. doi: 10.2196/26139.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing a machine learning-based decision support tool for pre-hospital assessment of dyspnoea by emergency medical service clinicians: a retrospective observational study.推进一种基于机器学习的决策支持工具,供紧急医疗服务临床医生用于院前呼吸困难评估:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 5;25(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01166-9.
2
Prediction of short-term adverse clinical outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism using conventional machine learning and deep Learning based on CTPA images.基于CTPA图像,使用传统机器学习和深度学习预测急性肺栓塞的短期不良临床结局。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Feb;58(2):331-339. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-03044-4. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Saddle versus non-saddle pulmonary embolism: differences in the clinical, echocardiographic, and outcome characteristics.鞍状与非鞍状肺栓塞:临床、超声心动图和预后特征的差异。
Libyan J Med. 2022 Dec;17(1):2044597. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2022.2044597.
2
Saddle Pulmonary Embolism: Demographics, Clinical Presentation, and Outcomes.马鞍形肺栓塞:人口统计学、临床表现及预后
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jun 11;3(6):e0437. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000437. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Clinical importance of the distribution of pulmonary artery embolism in acute pulmonary embolism.
Association between Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score and Body Composition, Inflammation and Frailty in Hospitalized Elderly Patients.
住院老年患者的控制营养状况(CONUT)评分与身体成分、炎症和虚弱的关系。
Nutrients. 2024 Feb 20;16(5):576. doi: 10.3390/nu16050576.
4
Efficient management of pulmonary embolism diagnosis using a two-step interconnected machine learning model based on electronic health records data.基于电子健康记录数据,使用两步互联机器学习模型对肺栓塞诊断进行高效管理。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2024 Mar 6;12(1):17. doi: 10.1007/s13755-024-00276-9. eCollection 2024 Dec.
急性肺栓塞中肺动脉栓塞分布的临床重要性。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Apr;49(4):3000605211004769. doi: 10.1177/03000605211004769.
4
The addition of echocardiographic parameters to PESI risk score improves mortality prediction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: PESI-Echo score.超声心动图参数的加入提高了急性肺栓塞患者 PESI 评分的死亡率预测:PESI-Echo 评分。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 May 11;10(3):250-257. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa007.
5
[External validation of prognostic scores for in-hospital and 30-day mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism in Argentina].[阿根廷肺栓塞患者院内及30天死亡率预后评分的外部验证]
Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80(5):462-472.
6
Predictive analytics with gradient boosting in clinical medicine.临床医学中基于梯度提升的预测分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Apr;7(7):152. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.03.29.
7
Oxygen saturation or respiratory rate to improve risk stratification in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism.氧饱和度或呼吸频率对血流动力学稳定的急性肺栓塞患者的风险分层的改善作用。
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;16(12):2397-2402. doi: 10.1111/jth.14299. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
8
Contemporary Management and Outcomes of Patients with Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism.当代大量和次大面积肺栓塞患者的管理与结局。
Am J Med. 2018 Dec;131(12):1506-1514.e0. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.07.035. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
9
Red blood cell transfusion and outcomes in acute pulmonary embolism.红细胞输注与急性肺栓塞的结局。
Respirology. 2018 Oct;23(10):935-941. doi: 10.1111/resp.13314. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
10
Anemia is not a risk factor for developing pulmonary embolism.贫血不是发生肺栓塞的危险因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):146-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.09.068. Epub 2016 Sep 30.