Zhang Jing, Liu Feng, Smith Andrew P
School of Humanity and Law, Social Governance Innovation Research Center, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Centre for Occupational and Health Psychology, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Psychol Rep. 2024 Jun;127(3):1480-1501. doi: 10.1177/00332941231168783. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
Current studies lack adequate analysis of the antecedents of the two forms of work-related rumination. However, understanding the relationship between different types of stress and the two forms of rumination is of profound significance for eliminating the influence of negative rumination. In this project, three studies were conducted to investigate the cumulative and immediate effects of challenge and hindrance stress on affective rumination and problem-solving rumination based on one-time, two-time points and daily measurements. Participants were 1109, 605 and 111 employees from a variety of jobs in Chinese mainland. The results showed the relationship between hindrance stress and affective rumination varies over different time course. There was no significant correlation between hindrance stress and problem-solving rumination over any time course. The relationship between challenge stress and two forms of work-related rumination varies over different time course. The results of this study suggest that the antecedent analysis of work-related rumination should not only give attention to the type of work stress, but also consider the time of work stress when analyzing its aftereffects.
目前的研究缺乏对两种工作相关反刍形式的前因进行充分分析。然而，了解不同类型的压力与这两种反刍形式之间的关系对于消除消极反刍的影响具有深远意义。在本项目中，基于一次性、两个时间点和每日测量，进行了三项研究，以调查挑战性压力和阻碍性压力对情感反刍和解决问题式反刍的累积效应和即时效应。参与者分别是来自中国大陆不同工作岗位的1109名、605名和111名员工。结果表明，阻碍性压力与情感反刍之间的关系在不同时间进程中有所不同。在任何时间进程中，阻碍性压力与解决问题式反刍之间均无显著相关性。挑战性压力与两种工作相关反刍形式之间的关系在不同时间进程中有所不同。本研究结果表明，对工作相关反刍的前因分析不仅应关注工作压力的类型，还应在分析其后果时考虑工作压力的时间。
