Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Division of Molecular Epidemiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Japan.
Ageing Res Rev. 2023 Jun;87:101923. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.101923. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
To evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cancer mortality in the general population and on prognosis in cancer patients, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) and individual patient data (IPD) was conducted. Overall, 14 RCTs with a total of 104,727 participants (2015 cancer deaths) were identified and 7 RCTs, including 90 % of all study participants (n = 94,068), could be included in the IPD meta-analyses. The main meta-analysis of the 14 RCTs yielded a statistically non-significant reduction in cancer mortality by 6 % (risk ratio (RR) [95%-confidence interval (95%CI)]: 0.94 [0.86-1.02]). Subgroup analyses revealed a 12 % lower cancer mortality in the vitamin D group compared with the placebo group in 10 trials with a daily dosing regimen (RR [95%CI]: 0.88 [0.78-0.98]), whereas no mortality reduction was seen in 4 trials using a bolus regimen (RR [95%CI]: 1.07 [0.91-1.24]; p-value for interaction: 0.042). The IPD meta-analysis (RR [95%CI]: 0.93 [0.84; 1.02]) confirmed the finding of all trials. The IPD were used to test effect modification by age, sex, body mass index, ethnicity, baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration, adherence and cancer-related factors but no statistically significant findings were obtained in meta-analyses of all trials. When restricted to trials with daily dosing in a post-hoc analysis, adults aged ≥ 70 years (RR [95%CI]: 0.83 [0.77; 0.98]) and subjects with vitamin D therapy initiation before cancer diagnosis (RR [95%CI]: 0.87 [0.69; 0.99]) appeared to benefit most from daily vitamin D supplementation. Measurements of baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and inclusion of other than non-Hispanic White adults were too sparse in the trials to draw conclusions. Results for all-cause and cancer-specific survival of participants with cancer were comparable to those obtained in the general population for cancer mortality. In conclusion, vitamin D did not reduce cancer mortality in the main meta-analysis of all RCTs because the observed risk reduction by 6 % was not statistically significant. However, a subgroup analysis revealed that vitamin D administered daily, in contrast to bolus supplementation, reduced cancer mortality by 12 %.
为了评估维生素 D 补充剂对普通人群癌症死亡率和癌症患者预后的影响,我们对随机、安慰剂对照试验(RCT)和个体患者数据(IPD)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。总体而言,共确定了 14 项 RCT,涉及 104727 名参与者(2015 例癌症死亡),其中 7 项 RCT(包括所有研究参与者的 90%[n=94068])可纳入 IPD 荟萃分析。对 14 项 RCT 的主要荟萃分析显示,癌症死亡率降低了 6%(风险比(RR)[95%置信区间(95%CI)]:0.94 [0.86-1.02])。亚组分析显示,在 10 项每日剂量方案的试验中,维生素 D 组的癌症死亡率比安慰剂组低 12%(RR [95%CI]:0.88 [0.78-0.98]),而在 4 项冲击剂量方案的试验中则未观察到死亡率降低(RR [95%CI]:1.07 [0.91-1.24];交互作用 p 值:0.042)。IPD 荟萃分析(RR [95%CI]:0.93 [0.84-1.02])证实了所有试验的发现。我们使用 IPD 来检验年龄、性别、体重指数、种族、基线 25-羟维生素 D 浓度、依从性和癌症相关因素的效应修饰,但在所有试验的荟萃分析中未发现统计学意义的结果。在事后分析中,当仅限于每日剂量的试验时,年龄≥70 岁的成年人(RR [95%CI]:0.83 [0.77-0.98])和癌症诊断前开始维生素 D 治疗的患者(RR [95%CI]:0.87 [0.69-0.99])似乎从每日维生素 D 补充中获益最大。试验中基线 25-羟维生素 D 水平的测量和非非西班牙裔白人成年人以外的参与者的纳入太少,无法得出结论。癌症患者的全因和癌症特异性生存率的结果与癌症死亡率的一般人群结果相当。总之,由于观察到的 6%的风险降低没有统计学意义,因此,所有 RCT 的主要荟萃分析并未显示维生素 D 可降低癌症死亡率。然而,亚组分析显示,与冲击补充相比,每日给予维生素 D 可降低 12%的癌症死亡率。