Stem Cell Transplantation Center, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China.
Front Immunol. 2023 Mar 17;14:1146997. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1146997. eCollection 2023.
Hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia (HAAA) is a rare variant of acquired aplastic anemia characterized with a syndrome of bone marrow failure after hepatitis. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of consecutive severe HAAA patients who received immunosuppressive therapy (IST, = 70), matched-sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT, = 26) or haploidentical-donor (HID) HSCT ( = 11) as the first-line treatment. In the IST group, the hematologic response (HR) rate was 55.71% at 6 months. In contrast, HSCT recipients exhibited significantly more rapid and sustained hematopoiesis (HR 76.92%, 96.15% and 96.15% at 3, 6 and 12months, respectively). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was not different among IST (83.7 ± 4.9%), MSD-HSCT (93.3 ± 6.4%) and HID-HSCT group (80.8 ± 12.3%). Compared with IST, MSD and HID-HSCT demonstrated a trend of superiority in the estimated 5-year failure-free survival rates (93.3 ± 6.4% vs 64.3 ± 6.0%, = 0.05; 80.8 ± 12.3% vs 64.3 ± 6.0%, = 0.57). In subsequent stratified analysis on age, we found that HID-HSCT showed its efficacy and safety among young patients. In sum, MSD-HSCT remains first-line treatment choice for HAAA, whereas HID-HSCT represents an alternative treatment choice in addition to IST for young patients (< 40 years) without a matched sibling donor.
肝炎相关性再生障碍性贫血(HAAA)是一种罕见的获得性再生障碍性贫血,其特征是在肝炎后骨髓衰竭综合征。我们回顾性分析了接受免疫抑制治疗(IST,n=70)、同胞供体造血干细胞移植(MSD-HSCT,n=26)或单倍体供体(HID)HSCT(n=11)作为一线治疗的连续重型 HAAA 患者的结局。在 IST 组中,6 个月时的血液学反应(HR)率为 55.71%。相比之下,HSCT 受者表现出更快和更持续的造血(HR 分别为 76.92%、96.15%和 96.15%,在 3、6 和 12 个月时)。IST(83.7±4.9%)、MSD-HSCT(93.3±6.4%)和 HID-HSCT 组的 5 年总生存率(OS)无差异。与 IST 相比,MSD 和 HID-HSCT 在估计的 5 年无失败生存率方面有优势的趋势(93.3±6.4%比 64.3±6.0%,=0.05;80.8±12.3%比 64.3±6.0%,=0.57)。在后续按年龄分层分析中,我们发现 HID-HSCT 在年轻患者中显示出其疗效和安全性。总之,MSD-HSCT 仍然是 HAAA 的一线治疗选择,而 HID-HSCT 代表了除 IST 之外的另一种治疗选择,适用于年轻患者(<40 岁)且无匹配的同胞供体。