Research Group in Community Health and Care (SALCOM), Faculty of Health Science, Valencian International University, Castelló de la Plana, Spain.
Grupo de Investigación en Cuidados y Salud (GRUPAC), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 17;11:1119117. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1119117. eCollection 2023.
Scientific activity has been connected to the proven inequality between women and men. To examine the state of gender equality in nursing research by analyzing the representation of male and female as editors and as authors of articles published in scientific journals.
A cross-sectional study was carried out between September-2019 and May-2020. All the scientific publications published in 115 nursing journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports in the years 2008, 2013, and 2017 were chosen as analysis units. The main variables studied were gender of the "journal editor"; gender of the "first author", "last author", "corresponding author", and "first author in funded articles". Descriptive and inferential analysis was performed.
The proportion of male editors in 2008, 2013, and 2017 was 23.3, 19, and 18.5% respectively, with a male/female ratio of 1:3, 1:4 and 1:5. Male editors are mainly found in the journals of the first quartile (Q1 = 33.8%, ratio1:2), compared to the journals of the fourth quartile (Q4 = 6.6%, ratio1:14), < 0.01. The male authorship position was "last author" (30.9%, ratio1:2), "corresponding author" (23.3%, ratio 1:3), "first author" (22.1%, ratio 1:4) and "first author in funded articles" (21.8%, ratio 1:4). Furthermore, in 19.5%, of the articles there were more male authors. The percentage of articles with male authorship increased from 2008 to 2017, "first author" (21.1-23.4%; < 0.01), "last author" (30.0-31.1%; = 0.22), "corresponding author" (22.5-24.2; p = 0.01), and "first author in funded articles" (18.1-25.9%; < 0.001).
Men are over-represented in the editor role in the most prestigious nursing journals. There are a higher proportion of male authors in the main positions of authorship.
科学活动与男女之间已证实的不平等有关。通过分析在科学期刊上发表的文章的编辑和作者中男性和女性的代表性,来研究护理研究中的性别平等状况。
这是一项在 2019 年 9 月至 2020 年 5 月间进行的横断面研究。选择了在 2008 年、2013 年和 2017 年列入期刊引文报告(Journal Citation Reports)的 115 种护理期刊中发表的所有科学出版物作为分析单位。研究的主要变量为“期刊编辑”的性别;“第一作者”、“最后作者”、“通讯作者”和“资助文章的第一作者”的性别。进行描述性和推断性分析。
2008 年、2013 年和 2017 年男性编辑的比例分别为 23.3%、19%和 18.5%,男女比例为 1:3、1:4 和 1:5。男性编辑主要出现在第一四分位数(Q1 = 33.8%,比例 1:2)的期刊中,而不是第四四分位数(Q4 = 6.6%,比例 1:14)的期刊中, < 0.01。男性作者的位置为“最后作者”(30.9%,比例 1:2)、“通讯作者”(23.3%,比例 1:3)、“第一作者”(22.1%,比例 1:4)和“资助文章的第一作者”(21.8%,比例 1:4)。此外,19.5%的文章中有更多的男性作者。2008 年至 2017 年,男性作者的文章比例有所增加,“第一作者”(21.1%-23.4%; < 0.01)、“最后作者”(30.0%-31.1%; = 0.22)、“通讯作者”(22.5%-24.2%;p = 0.01)和“资助文章的第一作者”(18.1%-25.9%; < 0.001)。
男性在最负盛名的护理期刊的编辑角色中占据了过多的代表地位。在主要的作者位置上,男性作者的比例更高。