Suppr超能文献

两名重复献血者中出现前带现象的高滴度抗体。

High Titer Antibodies Demonstrating Prozone in Two Repeat Blood Donors.

作者信息

Malhotra Sheetal, Jain Ashish, Sachdev Suchet, Sharma Ratti Ram

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2023 Apr;39(2):335-339. doi: 10.1007/s12288-022-01583-5. Epub 2022 Nov 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

  • Prozone phenomenon due to excess unbound antibodies may sometimes lead to failure of detection of ABO incompatibility. . The case series describes immunohematology work up of blood group discrepancies of two blood donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  • Blood grouping was performed by a fully automated immune hematology analyzer (FAIHA Diagast, Qwalys 3, France) based on the principle of erythrocyte magnetized technology. Further immunohematology workup was done by tube technique (at different temperatures and phases) and column agglutination technique (CAT). Antibody titration was done by tube technique at saline and AHG (anti human globulin) phase.

RESULTS

  • Type I blood group discrepancy was detected on initial blood grouping done by an automated analyzer. The discrepancy was resolved by repeat blood grouping by tube technique with a remarkable finding of hemolysis in reverse grouping. The lysis was attributed to high titer antibodies (anti-B titer of 512) with demonstration of prozone phenomenon. However, there was no discrepancy between cell and serum grouping by column agglutination technique (CAT).

CONCLUSION

  • Tube technique is the gold standard method for blood grouping and detects blood group discrepancies optimally. Hemolysis which is taken as a positive result, can be best appreciated by tube technique.
摘要

引言

由于未结合抗体过量导致的前带现象有时可能会导致ABO血型不相容检测失败。本病例系列描述了两名献血者血型不符的免疫血液学检查情况。

材料与方法

采用基于红细胞磁化技术原理的全自动免疫血液分析仪(法国Diagast公司的FAIHA Diagast,Qwalys 3)进行血型鉴定。进一步的免疫血液学检查通过试管技术(在不同温度和阶段)和柱凝集技术(CAT)进行。抗体滴定通过试管技术在盐水和抗人球蛋白(AHG)阶段进行。

结果

在自动分析仪进行的初次血型鉴定中检测到I型血型不符。通过试管技术重复血型鉴定解决了该不符问题,在反向定型中出现明显的溶血现象。溶血归因于高滴度抗体(抗B滴度为512),并证实存在前带现象。然而,通过柱凝集技术(CAT)进行的细胞和血清血型鉴定之间没有差异。

结论

试管技术是血型鉴定的金标准方法,能最佳地检测出血型不符情况。被视为阳性结果的溶血现象,通过试管技术能得到最佳观察。

相似文献

1
High Titer Antibodies Demonstrating Prozone in Two Repeat Blood Donors.两名重复献血者中出现前带现象的高滴度抗体。
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2023 Apr;39(2):335-339. doi: 10.1007/s12288-022-01583-5. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
10
An ABO blood grouping discrepancy: Probable B(A) phenotype.ABO血型不符:可能为B(A)血型表型。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2017 Jun;56(3):459-460. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 10.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验