• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quality, Readability, and Accessibility of Online Content From a Google Search of "Macular Degeneration": Critical Analysis.谷歌搜索“黄斑变性”在线内容的质量、可读性和可及性:批判性分析
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2022 Jun 9;6(6):437-442. doi: 10.1177/24741264221094683. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
2
Assessment of Online Sites Reliability, Accountability, Readability, Accessibility, and Translation for Intravitreal Injections.评估玻璃体腔内注射的在线网站的可靠性、问责制、可读性、可及性和翻译质量。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Dec;4(12):1188-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
3
Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.对颈部提升术在线信息的质量、可读性及技术方面的批判性分析
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Mar 1;19(2):115-120. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1219.
4
A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.青光眼在线信息的质量、可读性及技术质量综合评估
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023 Jan-Feb;6(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
5
Assessing the Quality, Content, and Readability of Freely Available Online Information for Patients Regarding Age-Related Macular Degeneration.评估关于年龄相关性黄斑变性的免费在线患者信息的质量、内容和可读性。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug 18;36(5-6):400-405. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1893761. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.评估失败性脊柱手术后在线资源的质量、内容和可读性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):494-502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002870.
7
Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.青光眼在线患者教育材料的可读性和适宜性。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Sep-Oct;5(5):525-530. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis.用于医疗保健过渡的镰状细胞病网络资源质量:网站内容分析
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Dec 13;6:e48924. doi: 10.2196/48924.
9
Analysis of Trustworthiness and Readability of English and Spanish Hypo- and Hyperthyroid-Related Online Patient Education Information.英文和西班牙文甲状腺功能减退和亢进相关在线患者教育信息的可信度与可读性分析
J Patient Exp. 2023 May 31;10:23743735231179063. doi: 10.1177/23743735231179063. eCollection 2023.
10
Third Molars on the Internet: A Guide for Assessing Information Quality and Readability.互联网上的第三磨牙:信息质量与可读性评估指南
Interact J Med Res. 2015 Oct 6;4(4):e19. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4712.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the Accuracy and Readability of Glaucoma-related Question Responses and Educational Materials by Google and ChatGPT.比较谷歌和ChatGPT生成的青光眼相关问题答案及教育材料的准确性和可读性。
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2024 Jul-Sep;18(3):110-116. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1448. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Google Trends-Assisted Analysis of the Readability, Accountability, and Accessibility of Online Patient Education Materials for the Treatment of AMD After US FDA Approval of Pegcetacoplan.谷歌趋势辅助分析美国食品药品监督管理局批准培西他科兰后在线患者教育材料在年龄相关性黄斑变性治疗方面的可读性、可问责性和可及性。
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024 Apr 30;8(4):421-427. doi: 10.1177/24741264241250156. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
3
Disease Awareness Among Patients With Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Patterns and Predictors.年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的疾病认知:模式与预测因素
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2023 Dec 14;8(1):58-66. doi: 10.1177/24741264231210078. eCollection 2024 Jan-Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Online Sites Reliability, Accountability, Readability, Accessibility, and Translation for Intravitreal Injections.评估玻璃体腔内注射的在线网站的可靠性、问责制、可读性、可及性和翻译质量。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Dec;4(12):1188-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
2
Assessment of the Quality, Content, and Readability of Freely Available Online Information for Patients Regarding Diabetic Retinopathy.关于糖尿病视网膜病变的面向患者的免费在线信息的质量、内容及可读性评估
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 1;137(11):1240-1245. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3116.
3
The impact of health and health insurance literacy on access to care for Hispanic/Latino communities.健康与健康保险素养对西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区获得医疗服务的影响。
Public Health Nurs. 2018 May;35(3):176-183. doi: 10.1111/phn.12385. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
4
Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球失明和远距离视力损伤原因 1990-2020:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1221-e1234. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Updates on the Epidemiology of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.年龄相关性黄斑变性的流行病学最新进展。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017 Nov-Dec;6(6):493-497. doi: 10.22608/APO.2017251. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.对颈部提升术在线信息的质量、可读性及技术方面的批判性分析
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Mar 1;19(2):115-120. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1219.
7
Low Health Literacy among Immigrant Hispanics.移民西班牙裔的健康素养低。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Jun;4(3):480-483. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0249-5. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
8
Automated Detection of HONcode Website Conformity Compared to Manual Detection: An Evaluation.与人工检测相比,HONcode网站合规性的自动检测:一项评估
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 2;17(6):e135. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3831.
9
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
10
Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.在线眼科患者信息的可读性评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;131(12):1610-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5521.

谷歌搜索“黄斑变性”在线内容的质量、可读性和可及性:批判性分析

Quality, Readability, and Accessibility of Online Content From a Google Search of "Macular Degeneration": Critical Analysis.

作者信息

Hua Hong-Uyen, Rayess Nadim, Li Angela S, Do Diana, Rahimy Ehsan

机构信息

Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Vitreoretin Dis. 2022 Jun 9;6(6):437-442. doi: 10.1177/24741264221094683. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/24741264221094683
PMID:37009540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9954772/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This work aims to assess the quality, accountability, readability, accessibility, and presence of Spanish translation in online material through a Google search of "macular degeneration".

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional analysis of website results from a Google search of "macular degeneration", the quality and accountability for each website were assessed using the DISCERN criteria and the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode) principles. All 31 sites were independently graded by 2 ophthalmologists. Readability was evaluated using an online tool. The presence of accessibility features on the website and Spanish translation was recorded. The primary outcome measure was the DISCERN and HONcode quality and accountability scores of each website. Secondary outcome measures included the readability, accessibility, and presence of Spanish translation.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD of each criterion across all 15 DISCERN questions was 2.761 ± 0.666 (out of 5). The mean HONcode score for all websites was 7.355 ± 3.123. The mean consensus reading grade level was 10.258 ± 2.49. There were no statistically significant differences in any score between the top 5 websites and the bottom 26 websites evaluated. Accessibility was available on 10 of 31 websites. Spanish translation was available on 10 of 31 websites.

CONCLUSIONS

The top 5 websites that appeared on a Google search did not have better quality or readability of online content. Improving quality, accountability, and readability can help improve patients' health literacy regarding macular degeneration.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过谷歌搜索“黄斑变性”来评估在线材料的质量、问责制、可读性、可访问性以及西班牙语翻译情况。

方法

在对谷歌搜索“黄斑变性”的网站结果进行的这项回顾性横断面分析中,使用DISCERN标准和网络健康基金会行为准则(HONcode)原则评估每个网站的质量和问责制。所有31个网站均由2名眼科医生独立评分。使用在线工具评估可读性。记录网站上可访问性功能的存在情况以及西班牙语翻译情况。主要结局指标是每个网站的DISCERN和HONcode质量及问责制得分。次要结局指标包括可读性、可访问性以及西班牙语翻译情况。

结果

在所有15个DISCERN问题中,每个标准的均值±标准差为2.761±0.666(满分5分)。所有网站的HONcode平均得分为7.355±3.123。平均共识阅读年级水平为10.258±2.49。在评估的排名前5的网站和排名后26的网站之间,任何得分均无统计学显著差异。31个网站中有10个具备可访问性。31个网站中有10个提供西班牙语翻译。

结论

谷歌搜索中出现的排名前5的网站在线内容质量或可读性并未更好。提高质量、问责制和可读性有助于提高患者关于黄斑变性的健康素养。