Suppr超能文献

遗传学与年龄相关性眼病研究中新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的配方相互作用

Genetics and Age-Related Eye Disease Study Formulation Interaction in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

作者信息

Kaufman Stephen R, Yoganathan Pradeepa, Small Kent W, Rusia Deepam, Pachydaki Sophia I, Conti Stephen M, Wenz Robert E, Gersman Mark A, Shaya Fadi S, Kustra Rafal

机构信息

Vitreo-Retinal Consultants, Canton, OH, USA.

Kresge Eye Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Vitreoretin Dis. 2020 Aug 19;5(1):46-52. doi: 10.1177/2474126420941713. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This work aims to determine whether previously defined genotype risk groups interact with Age-Related Eye Disease Study formulation (AREDS-F) use in progression to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD).

METHODS

We conducted a case-only study of 265 nvAMD patients. Patients were anonymously genotyped at the complement factor H and age-related maculopathy susceptibility 2 loci and segregated into genotype groups (GTGs) defined by specific combinations of risk alleles. Physicians, who were blind to patients' GTGs, obtained patients' AREDS-F use history. The facility performing genetic analysis was blind to the AREDS-F use history. We used logistic analysis to estimate the interaction coefficient between AREDS-F use and GTG 2 vs GTG 3 in a general-population model.

RESULTS

The odds ratio of numbers of patients reporting prior AREDS-F use to nonuse for GTG 2 vs GTG 3 was 4.18 ( = .001). Logistic regression, correcting for nongenetic risk factors, gave an estimate of the β for interaction of AREDS-F with genotype of 1.57 ( = .001). This estimates a corrected odds ratio associated with the effect of interaction of 4.81 between those in GTG 2 compared with those in GTG 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate an interaction between GTGs and AREDS-F use that is consistent in size and direction with previously published reports, which had found that using AREDS-F supplements significantly increases the risk of nvAMD for some users and significantly protects other users.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定先前定义的基因型风险组是否与年龄相关性眼病研究配方(AREDS - F)的使用在进展为新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nvAMD)过程中存在相互作用。

方法

我们对265例nvAMD患者进行了一项仅涉及病例的研究。患者在补体因子H和年龄相关性黄斑病变易感性2位点进行匿名基因分型,并根据风险等位基因的特定组合分为基因型组(GTGs)。对患者GTGs不知情的医生获取患者的AREDS - F使用史。进行基因分析的机构对AREDS - F使用史不知情。我们在总体人群模型中使用逻辑分析来估计AREDS - F使用与GTG 2和GTG 3之间的相互作用系数。

结果

报告先前使用AREDS - F与未使用AREDS - F的GTG 2组与GTG 3组患者数量的比值比为4.18(P = 0.001)。校正非遗传风险因素后的逻辑回归得出AREDS - F与基因型相互作用的β估计值为1.57(P = 0.001)。这估计了GTG 2组与GTG 3组之间相互作用效应的校正比值比为4.81。

结论

我们的数据表明GTGs与AREDS - F使用之间存在相互作用,其大小和方向与先前发表的报告一致,先前的报告发现,使用AREDS - F补充剂会显著增加一些使用者患nvAMD的风险,同时显著保护其他使用者。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Age-Related Macular Degeneration Preferred Practice Pattern®.年龄相关性黄斑变性首选实践模式®
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jan;127(1):P1-P65. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Sep 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验